共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 468 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
团队创新已成为组织创新活动的基本组织形式，如何激发团队成员创新行为成为企业创新必须解决的关键问题。基于自我一致性理论与社会认知理论，以知识分享为中介变量，以团队层次的同事间信任为调节变量，构建跨层次有调节的中介模型，检验心理所有权影响团队成员创新行为的作用机制与边界条件。以51个高技术企业项目团队的392名团队成员为研究对象，采用Mplus7.4软件进行统计检验。研究结果表明：心理所有权积极影响团队成员创新行为；知识分享在心理所有权与创新行为关系中扮演中介效应；团队层次的同事间信任在中介模型的前半路径起到正向调节作用。本研究有助于加强对团队成员创新行为影响因素及作用机理的了解，也为管理者通过营造“家”的感觉激发团队成员实施更多创新行为提供借鉴。 相似文献
4.
Yan Yu Jin-Xing Hao Xiao-Ying Dong Mohamed Khalifa 《International Journal of Information Management》2013
Although it is a widely held belief that social capital facilitates knowledge sharing among individuals, there is little research that has deeply investigated the impacts of social capital at different levels on an individual's knowledge sharing behavior. To address this research gap, this study combines a multilevel approach and an optimal network configuration view to investigate the multilevel effects of social capital on individuals’ knowledge sharing in knowledge intensive work teams. This study makes a distinction between the social capital at the team-level and that of social capital at the individual level to examine their cross-level and direct effects on an individual's sharing of explicit and tacit knowledge. A survey involving 343 participants in 47 knowledge-intensive teams was conducted for testing the multilevel model. The results reveal that social capital at both levels jointly influences an individual's explicit and tacit knowledge sharing. Further, when individuals possess a moderate betweenness centrality and the whole team holds a moderate network density, team members’ knowledge sharing can be maximized. These findings offer a more comprehensive and precise understanding of the multilevel impacts of social capital on team members’ knowledge sharing behavior, thus contributing to the social capital theory, as well as knowledge management research and practices. 相似文献
5.
6.
本文探讨了影响知识共享的团队特征变量,并采用多层线性模型(HLM)对234个工作团队的813名成员的有效调查问卷进行了实证检验。结果表明,互依性(即任务互依性和成果互依性)与团队效能感均对知识共享起到积极影响作用;成员能力梯度对知识共享有负向影响作用。此外,任务互依性与成果互依性的交互作用对知识共享的影响也是显著的。最后对如何有效促进团队知识共享提出了建议。 相似文献
7.
采用结构方程模型分析了变革型领导、信任倾向、团队知识共享绩效的不同维度之间的关系,研究的样本包括791份有效问卷以及所对应的环境状况.研究结果表明,变革型领导通过信任倾向作为中介变量对团队知识共享绩效具有显著的影响作用;信任倾向在变革型领导与团队知识共享绩效之间起到部分中介作用;任务导向和关系导向的变革型领导对信任倾向和团队知识共享绩效的不同维度产生影响作用的路径是不同的,任务导向的变革型领导对共享意愿、共享行为、共享绩效有显著影响,关系导向的变革型领导对信任倾向、员工满意有显著影响. 相似文献
8.
本研究将知识共享分为知识贡献和知识搜集两个维度,利用均值和差异两种不同的构建方法,采用知识贡献强度、知识贡献差异、知识搜集强度、知识搜集差异4个维度的组合描述团队知识共享行为结构,并分析了几种典型共享行为结构的特点。以IPO模型为基础,研究了团队激励和团队共享氛围对共享行为结构的影响,以及不同共享行为结构对共享满意、团队绩效和团队创新的作用,提出了研究命题,构建了研究模型,为未来进一步研究奠定了基础,也为团队知识共享研究提供了新的视角。 相似文献
9.
基于440份配对调查数据,揭示交互过程视角下知识分享报酬对知识型团队成员知识分享行为的影响机制。研究表明：(1) 当知识型团队成员作为知识需求者时,知识寻求顾虑对知识寻求行为有阻碍影响,但对知识创造行为有促进影响,而作为知识拥有者时,知识给予顾虑对知识给予行为和知识创造行为均有阻碍影响;(2) 内在和外在报酬不仅对知识寻求和给予行为均有显著的直接影响,而且对知识寻求顾虑与知识寻求行为、知识给予顾虑与知识给予行为之间负向关系起到减弱型调节作用;(3) 除直接作用外,内在和外在报酬分别对两种主观顾虑与知识创造行为之间关系起到方向不同的调节作用,即内在报酬起到增强型调节作用,外在报酬起到减弱型调节作用。 相似文献
10.
基于激发型信息处理的视角,探讨了合作目标互依性、知识共享和团队反思与科研团队创造力之间的关系,构建了相应的概念模型。运用结构方程模型和225个有效科研团队样本对所提出的假设进行检验。实证研究结果表明,合作目标互依性对科研团队创造力有积极影响;知识共享与团队反思在合作目标互依性与科研团队创造力之间具有完全中介效应,而知识共享对团队反思有正向促进作用。研究结果打开了合作目标影响科研团队创造力的信息处理黑箱,扩展了激发型信息处理视角在团队创造力研究领域中的应用。 相似文献
11.
12.
在分析项目导向型企业知识共享主体以及共享路径的基础上,对其知识共享障碍因素进行深入的研究。结果表明,项目导向型企业的知识共享障碍主要表现在个体与个体、团队与团队以及个体、团队与组织等3个层面。为解决项目导向型企业中知识共享的障碍问题,从搭建知识共享平台、制定制度保障和营造欢快、信任与合作的文化氛围等方面提出解决方案。 相似文献
13.
Yuwen LiuAuthor Vitae James S. PhillipsAuthor Vitae 《International Journal of Information Management》2011,31(1):44-52
This paper examines how transformational leadership (TFL) climate influences employees’ team identity and their intentions to share knowledge and how team knowledge sharing intention subsequently influences team innovativeness. Data was collected from 301 employees comprising 52 R&D teams. Hypotheses were tested with both hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) and regression analyses. Results indicated that TFL climate was related to employees’ intention to share knowledge through team identity. At the group level, results supported the relationships between team knowledge sharing intention and team innovativeness. The results also indicated that team knowledge sharing intention mediated the relationship between TFL climate and team innovativeness. 相似文献
14.
团队知识共享对提升团队的效率至关重要,如何促进团队知识共享也成为当下的研究热点之一。从线上与线下两个维度,对高校研究生科研团队内部的知识共享行为进行量化分析及对比研究,并进一步对情感信任这一知识共享行为的影响因素进行深入探讨。在构建理论模型的基础上,对通过问卷调查所收集的有效数据进行了分析,研究结果表明,线上知识共享行为与线下知识共享行为存在一定程度的相关性;与线下方式相比,线上方式更有助于提高成员之间知识共享的广度和深度;情感信任会同时对线上与线下的知识共享行为产生正向影响,相比较而言对线下的共享行为影响程度更大。 相似文献
15.
In this study, we tested the effects of several team features on knowledge sharing within teams of primary school teachers. We hypothesized that trust in team leader and trust in colleagues, mediated by team identification, will have a positive effect on knowledge sharing. We found indirect effects of both trust variables through team identification and a direct effect of trust in team members on knowledge sharing. We explored, furthermore, a moderator effect of team identification on the relation between team work value diversity and knowledge sharing to examine if team identification diminishes the potential negative effects of team work value diversity on knowledge sharing. Contrary to our expectations, we found no relation between work value diversity and knowledge sharing if team identification is low, while the relation takes a negative curvilinear form if team identification is high. This outcome is explained by the notion that signals of un-sameness in values can produce perceptions of threat and subsequent reactions in high identification teams. 相似文献
16.
基于知识管理的视角，探讨交互记忆系统、团队心智模型对团队创造力的影响以及探索式学习与知识共享的中介作用。以33个科研团队为样本的问卷调查表明：（1）交互记忆系统、团队心智模型均分别对团队创造力产生正U型曲线影响；（2）探索式学习、知识共享在交互记忆系统与团队创造力的关系中均起到完全中介作用，在团队心智模型与团队创造力的关系中均起到部分中介作用；（3）知识共享能力在探索式学习与团队创造力的关系中起到部分中介作用。 相似文献
17.
摘要：在文献研究的基础上,本文提出了团队性绩效考核对知识共享的影响模型,并通过234个工作团队的813名成员的有效调查问卷进行了实证检验。结果表明,团队性绩效考核不会直接促进知识共享,而是通过团队成员的分配公平感、人际信任、团队承诺间接地正向影响知识共享;任务相互依赖性、团队成员能力梯度、团队效能感等团队特征因素以及程序公平感、互动公平感在该影响过程中起到了调节作用。最后,进一步对如何有效实施团队性绩效考核提出了对策建议。
相似文献
18.
文章运用共享心智模型描述团队的知识共享和态度、信念的协同性,并对学术团队共享心智模型的结构进行验证性研究,根据样本数据调研结果分析认为团队内在价值意义水平对于团队知识创新能力的作用要明显高于隐性知识共享水平,因此从提高团队成员的团队文化和谐、激励机制合理、团队结构合适等具体方面着手,在各个细节上保障,充分体现团队成员个体利益及共享信念的认可度对于提高团队知识创新能力具有重要意义。 相似文献
19.
《International Journal of Information Management》2017,37(6):583-589
The research question is: How can intellectual property rights (IPRs) influence trust, attitudes, commitment, knowledge sharing, and innovation in inter-organisational project teams?The four strategically selected team cases include eight global knowledge-intensive industrial oil service companies in Norway. The methodology included 24 in-depth interviews done in 2016.The study finds that formal intellectual property rights are key to building up and keeping trust in the team and also for building up the right attitudes within the team. The IPRs increased the innovativeness in the team and incremental innovations. The IPRs fostered a unique knowledge sharing in these four teams enabling them to work towards innovative solutions and delivering in time. Formal IPŔs foster informal trust and expertise sharing and by that also the inter- organizational cooperation. The confidence and knowledge sharing strengthen the possibility for future collaboration and innovations both on an individual level and on a corporate level. The theoretical implication of our findings is that IPRs increase the trust, commitment, and attitudes within the team providing knowledge sharing and innovativeness for improved solutions and results. IPRs are positive for collaboration, and they are complementary governance mechanisms.The practical implication is that IPRs must be defined and accepted before the corporations start up the inter-organizational teamwork. The contract typology should in the start up be sensitizing giving directions and security and in the end definitive. 相似文献
20.
Carla Curado Mírian Oliveira Antonio Carlos Gastaud Maçada Felipe Nodari 《知识管理研究与实践》2017,15(1):45-53
This study addresses the contribution of knowledge sharing behaviour and absorptive capacity to innovation at team level. Although the hypotheses reflect the dominant literature, the study’s novelty lies in the data collected from several industries in Portugal, avoiding possible industry bias. Relationships are tested outside sectors where traditionally team effects are studied, for example healthcare. Data were collected from 141 employees working in organizational teams, excluding top management teams, which are often the object of research addressing phenomena leading to innovation. There is no evidence in support of organizational size effect, team’s geographic concentration effect or gender effect. However, team tenure duration is positively related to increased knowledge sharing, that is, recent teams do not share as much knowledge as older ones. Structural Equation Modelling was used to test the mediation effect of absorptive capacity between individual knowledge sharing behaviour and team innovation. Evidence in support of full mediation was found. 相似文献