首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 953 毫秒
1.
This article reports on scholarly communication and open access (OA) in Korea. Drawing on a range of databases, articles, and reference sources, it provides unique insights. In contrast to the UK/US model of scholarly communication, in Korea, most scholarly journals are published by discipline‐based scholarly societies and research institutes affiliated to universities. Payment for publication is the norm, and typically features article processing charges and scholarly society membership fees for both OA and toll access (TA) journals. Online access to journals in Korea is provided by commercial vendors who enter into contracts with the scholarly societies for exclusive use. Three online access models apply – TA, gold OA, and dual access – with the use of these models varying between disciplines. In parallel with this access provided by commercial vendors, there are a number of government‐funded open access repositories (OARs) to which university researchers are requested to deposit their research outputs, as well as OARs run by universities and other research institutes.  相似文献   

2.
This research provides insight into the complex relationship between open access, funding, and citation advantage. It presents an analysis of research articles and their citations in the Scopus database across 40 subject categories. The sample includes 12 categories from Health Sciences, 7 from Life Sciences, 10 from Physical Sciences & Engineering, and 11 from Social Sciences & Humanities. Specifically, the analysis focuses on articles published in 2016 and the citations they received from 2016 to 2020. Our findings show that open access articles published in hybrid journals receive considerably more citations than those published in gold open access journals. Articles under the hybrid gold modality are cited on average twice as much as those in the gold modality, regardless of funding. Furthermore, we found that funded articles generally obtain 50 % more citations than unfunded ones within the same publication modality. Open access repositories significantly increase citations, particularly for articles without funding. Thus, articles in open access repositories receive 50 % more citations than paywalled ones.  相似文献   

3.
基于开放牛津期刊的开放获取引用优势分析   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
本文以"开放牛津"的93种混合型期刊为研究样本,对其2009年刊载的全部论文的被引频次进行统计分析,以验证关于开放获取引用优势(OACA)的三个假设:存在开放获取引用优势;不同学科的OACA不同;OACA与期刊影响因子有相关性。通过研究发现:开放牛津期刊存在OACA,开放牛津期刊中的OA论文与非OA论文相比有138.87%的引用优势;五个学科领域的开放牛津期刊的OACA存在差异(其中人文科学不存在OACA);开放获取引用优势与期刊影响因子之间具有显著的逆函数关系,即随着期刊影响因子的增长,开放获取引用优势呈下降趋势。  相似文献   

4.
中国科技期刊开放存取出版现状   总被引:33,自引:1,他引:33  
程维红  任胜利 《编辑学报》2007,19(3):196-198
基于《2005年版中国科技期刊引证报告》所收录的1608种我国科技期刊,搜索并统计分析了我国科技期刊的开放存取出版(open access publishing,OAP)现状.结果表明:我国OA期刊已具有一定的数量规模(143种),但部分期刊OA出版的持续性较差,且大都为单刊OA,难以形成信息集成的优势;医学、生物学、农业科学和化学领域中OA期刊的数量相对较多,并且,在同领域中OA期刊的引证影响明显高于非OA期刊.认为我国的相关部门不仅要致力于组建稳定可靠的、有较大信息量的OA期刊网站,而且要关注学术论文的开放存档(open archive).  相似文献   

5.
6.
Hybrid open access journals generally authorize self-archiving along with Author-pays model. Given the dependence of the Author-pays model on APCs paid by authors, it is expected to have a negative association with the free-of-charge Green model. By exploring a sample of 52,150 papers published in 47 Elsevier's hybrid journals, the study compares the OA models' citation performances to non-open access (NOA) model's and investigates the relationship between the quantities of their papers.Three OA groups are identified, including Green-only, APC-only and Green-APC. The OA papers show a citation advantage over the NOA articles, despite their lower number. The mixed APC-Green, gains the highest citation compared to the three other access models. However, the number of Green and APC-funded papers are revealed to have a negative association. Although, the combination of the Green and APC models magnifies the impact of OA papers, the inverse association between the quantities of their papers signifies that the lower number of the latter can be partially explained by the prevalence of the former. The results help academic librarians involved in advocating and managing OA to better understand authors' behaviors towards OA models and adopt a more supportive role for OA according to their preferences.  相似文献   

7.
8.
通过问卷调查了解我国科研人员对学术信息资源开放获取的参与现状及影响因素等,在此基础上,主要从科研人员整体及有参与经历的科研人员两个角度,根据影响较大的因素分析科研人员参与开放获取的主要推动力,包括:保证科研人员对OA有足够的认知程度,建设具权威性和影响力的OA资源,保持OA出版模式的优势,避免知识产权纠纷,将OA资源纳入学术评价体系,对OA期刊投稿提供经费支持。  相似文献   

9.
总结主要的资助机构、出版社和开放仓储对开放资源的再利用许可和限制规定,分析主要开放获取期刊和开放仓储资源提供的技术接口方式,最后提出开放资源的6种开放资源的再利用服务模式:开放资源的集成检索服务、开放资源之间的关联服务、开放资源的使用统计服务、学术引用网络分析服务、语义丰富后数据的开放利用服务、开放资源专题聚合成的虚拟开放期刊服务。  相似文献   

10.
11.
[目的/意义] 开放获取进程中的"双重收费"问题引起了出版商、图书馆及科研人员的关注与讨论。本文在此背景下分析探索学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化的中国路径,以期引起高校图书馆对开放获取进程中"双重收费"问题的关注,为新时期高校图书馆文献资源建设的转型发展提供启示。[方法/过程] 通过文献调研与网络调研,梳理高校图书馆推动学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化的必然性和可行性,以及当前学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化的相关实践,分析总结高校图书馆在推动学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化过程中的困境,并就如何实现转化提出相关建议。[结果/结论] 高校图书馆应从观念上认识到学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化的重要性,把研究全面开放获取作为图书馆文献资源建设的重要工作之一,以高校联盟的形式主动开展评估调研,参与国家层面的规则制定,积极研究定价模式,推进相关政策落地,推动科研成果共建共享最大化。  相似文献   

12.
This study analyzes the current state of gold Open Access (OA) in India based on papers published in the Web of Science indexed journals. It specifically focuses on research output published in OA journals and examines the difference between gold OA and general research output for papers authored by Indian researchers. In order to analyze the Indian contribution of gold OA literature and compares with other countries, Web of Science?-Core Collection was used. There is an increasing trend of contributing research papers in OA journals by Indian researchers. Among the top 20 publishing countries India ranks 10th place in terms of the general research output, but secures 8th place in terms of gold OA papers. However, India's position in terms of share of gold OA publications is relatively higher than other leading countries of the world. Researchers in India mostly prefer to contribute their gold OA papers in Indian journals rather foreign journals and the proportion of gold OA research output in Clinical, Preclinical, Health, Life Sciences and Physicals Sciences is much higher than other disciplines such as Arts &; Humanities and Social Sciences. Since most of the research output in India is published in local journals, the study suggests further analyses of publications which are not published in Web of Science indexed journals.  相似文献   

13.
This study examines the payment policies of a list of standalone predatory open access journals available on scholarlyoa.com . It is found that 72% do charge article publication fees (APCs), which is a higher percentage than found in DOAJ journals. The mean number of articles published during 2013 was 227, but ranged from 4 to 2,286 articles. The majority of journals charge low APCs and can be assumed to have modest annual incomes. There was no correlation between the amount of APC charged and the number of articles published. Comparing the number of journals charging APCs compared to the percentage from DOAJ, the findings suggest a connection between predatory practices and charging author fees. However, a comprehensive assessment of the dynamics of open access journal publishing beyond author charges should be done to avoid using APCs alone as a measure of whether a journal is predatory or not.  相似文献   

14.
  • 2021, open access articles in parent journals with higher charges accounted for 72% of the total open access articles in parent and mirror journals.
  • Although the charges for mirror journals were significantly reduced in 2021, the increase in the number of articles was relatively small.
  • These findings suggest that many authors do not significantly respond to changes in article processing charges.
  相似文献   

15.
The extent to which scholarly literature can be openly accessed and freely downloaded on the Internet varies greatly depending on the discipline. This article assesses the current state of open access in the fields of business and management. Google was used to search for free versions of articles from a sample of articles published in early 2009 in a broad array of business and management journals. Free versions of 36% of the articles included in this study were identified, available from a wide variety of websites, including repositories, author profile pages, open access journals, and more.  相似文献   

16.
[目的/意义] 探讨开放同行评议(OPR)对期刊论文的引文及社会关注度的影响。[方法/过程] 采用描述性统计及配对样本非参数检验方法,比较OPR与非OPR期刊在期刊年龄、SCI年龄、国别、出版周期、开放存取、评审透明度级别、论文引文及社会关注度指标上的差异,探索期刊一般特征对OPR期刊论文引文及社会关注度指标的影响,检验OPR期刊论文引文与社会关注度指标间的相关关系。[结果/结论] OPR期刊论文有显著的引文与社会关注度优势。国别对引文指标有显著影响,出版周期对引文及社会关注度均有显著影响。OPR期刊论文的引文指标与社会关注度指标显著正相关。  相似文献   

17.
国内外开放获取期刊现状调查研究   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
本文对DOAJ、HighWire出版社期刊开放仓储网络平台、日本科技信息网络电子平台、巴西科学在线图书馆、BioMed Central开放获取期刊网络出版平台等8个知名的期刊数据库/检索平台进行统计,将开放存取期刊按照出版社、ISSN、期刊名称、数据库检索平台、学科分类及出版国家信息以Excel列表。将统计所得的数据与艾利贝斯公司SFX知识库中的开放存取期刊列表去重合并,截止2009年3月,共统计开放存取期刊12531种,并以此数据为基础对国内外开放存取期刊现状进行研究。  相似文献   

18.
利用知识服务与知识传播提升学术期刊品牌影响力   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
蔡斐 《编辑学报》2016,28(3):253-255
学术期刊要重视知识服务与知识传播.引领学科发展,为行业服务,是学术期刊的办刊宗旨;通过多种渠道,加大知识传播,是学术期刊的重要责任.文章以《航空学报》编辑部办刊为例,通过约、组综述稿件,策划出版专刊、专栏,引领学科发展;通过开展科技论文写作讲座,提供知识服务;通过开放存取(OA)、论文推送、搭建微信公众平台等多种渠道,加速知识传播,最终提升期刊的品牌影响力.  相似文献   

19.
开放文档先导及其对学术期刊数字化传播方式的影响   总被引:17,自引:2,他引:15  
李丽  张成昱 《编辑学报》2004,16(1):66-68
信息技术的进步以及作者和读者的需求,推动着学术期刊数字化传播方式的发展.开放文档先导(OAI)是一个旨在促进网络信息资源传播的合作组织.开放文献元数据采集协议 (OAMHP) 通过元数据采集这种模式实现网上发布信息的不同组织之间的互操作.一些研究者和机构正试图通过建立"自归档"的开放访问文档来克服科学出版的费用壁垒.应当充分利用OAI提供的信息传播和交换能力来促进学术期刊的数字化传播.  相似文献   

20.
以CSSCI数据库中2003-2009年数据作为统计源,借助科学知识图谱的可视化技术手段,对这7年间的文献数据进行计量研究,将科技文献开放存取研究领域19位高被引学者为主的研究群体分为5个聚类,绘制我国开放存取研究主要代表人物知识图谱,通过引文分析,研究开放存取研究领域的现状和发展趋势,并提出建议。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号