共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 978 毫秒
1.
《国际创新研究学报(英文)》2022,6(3):156-168
The paper examines the relationship between gamification – the use of game elements in non-gaming contexts – and innovation teams’ outcomes. It builds on psychological and teamwork theories, arguing that gamification overcomes collaboration issues and generates multiple positive outcomes, particularly in coordination, alignment, engagement, and teams’ motivation. The research follows a qualitative theory-driven using a case study of an innovation project. The conceptual model built through the findings offers valuable insights about applying gamification in innovation teams, namely: i) surprising teams with such a new and playful approach reduces stress among team members; ii) rules and time constraints play a crucial role in teams’ coordination by avoiding dispersion and enhancing focused efforts. The paper provides a set of testable theoretical propositions derived from the conceptualization of gamification in the context of innovation teams. It supports innovation managers interested in measuring gamification outcomes in teams. 相似文献
2.
As a core organizational resource, business processes are vital for organizational teams. To deal with today’s volatile business environment, organizations need to be ambidextrous in terms of process capabilities. However, little is known about how process ambidexterity, process standardization, and process agility, are enabled by information technology (IT) and related to team-level activities. To fill this gap in the literature, we conducted a field study based on 160 teams of 1081 individuals from seven companies in South Korea. Our results show that IT enables both process standardization and agility, and that a team’s process ambidexterity has a positive effect on inter-team coordination and team innovation, which in turn have a direct impact on team performance. Our findings highlight the importance of process ambidexterity by investigating the enabling role of IT and its outcomes in a team. Our results offer theoretical and practical implications from the perspective of team process ambidexterity. 相似文献
3.
知识型任务所固有的时间约束条件的模糊性和变动性要求其超越知识协调,运用时间协调机制消除时间冲突,保证团队以整体的状态运行。针对现有团队时间协调机制的研究往往只侧重以团队时间领导为代表的外显时间协调机制而忽视内隐时间协调机制的现状,引入团队时间心智模型作为内隐时间协调机制,考察其对团队效能的影响,以及与团队时间领导的关系。对102个知识型团队样本进行统计分析,结果表明,团队时间领导和团队时间心智模型对团队绩效和成员满意度均有显著影响;团队时间心智模型在团队时间领导和团队效能间有显著的中介作用;时间压力调节了时间领导-时间心智模型以及时间领导-团队效能间的关系。 相似文献
4.
《Research Policy》1999,28(2-3):251-274
Large multinational firms are the drivers for the globalization of R&D and innovation activities. There was a strong movement to establish a transnational configuration of R&D between 1985 and 1995. In recent years, however, R&D strategies and international location decisions have changed substantially. This paper is based on an in-depth analysis of R&D internationalization in 21 large corporations in Europe, Japan and the US. Our findings suggest that transnational corporations have tended to consolidate and streamline their organizations since the mid-1990s. Distributed R&D activities and globally-dispersed innovation processes have resulted in overly complex and unmanageable organizational architectures. This has induced firms to search for `leaner' and more effective types of managing their international portfolio of innovation activities. We learned that the spatial distribution of learning and R&D performing activities is something different than the spatial distribution of coordination and control. Many companies in our sample have adapted a strategy of multiple centers of learning with one dominant center of coordination. A framework is developed to serve as a basis for analyzing different patterns of internationalization of R&D and innovation, and for assessing the appropriate mechanisms to coordinate and control an international network of technological competence centers. 相似文献
5.
How team composition exactly influences innovation outcomes remains a complex and unsolved puzzle in the literature on creativity and innovation. Our study differentiates two types of team technology-related diversity—technological dissimilarity and technological variety, and investigates their influences on the impact of an invention created by a team. Analyses of over half million U.S. utility patents in the 1991–2005 period invented by teams reveal that technological variety of team inventors has a positive effect on invention impact, and that technological dissimilarity between team inventors plays both positive and negative roles, eliciting an inverted U-shaped effect. In addition, we find that the positive effect of dissimilarity is significantly reduced after controlling for variety. Theoretical and practical implications of our findings are discussed. 相似文献
6.
Xuepan Zhong Qian Huang Robert M. Davison Xuan Yang Huaping Chen 《International Journal of Information Management》2012
Effective teamwork and knowledge coordination are becoming increasingly important for all kinds of organizations given the growing use of teams to tackle competitive challenges and sustain competitive advantage. In this study, we develop and validate a model of how two types of social network ties – expressive and instrumental – contribute to team efficacy and performance, mediated by three dimensions of a transactive memory system (TMS) – specialization, credibility and coordination within teams. We test the model in an empirical study drawing on data from 66 teams in a variety of organizations. The results suggest that both instrumental and expressive ties within teams can facilitate the formation of TMS and the three dimensions of TMS are all, even though to different extents, positively related to team efficacy. Team efficacy is also a powerful predictor of team performance. The findings in our study bridge the literature gap about social networks and TMS and explain the underlying process and mechanisms by which social network ties exert their influence on team outcomes. The results have implications for organizations that wish to leverage teams to take advantage of team members’ differentiated expertise and coordinate their work more effectively and efficiently. 相似文献
7.
《Information processing & management》2023,60(2):103237
Collaborations in funded teams are essential for understanding funded research and funding policies, although of high interest, are still not fully understood. This study aims to investigate directed collaboration patterns from the perspective of the knowledge flow, which is measured based on the academic age. To this end, we proposed a project-based team identification approach, which gives particular attention to funded teams. The method is applicable to other funding systems. Based on identified scientific teams, we detected recurring and significant subgraph patterns, known as network motifs, and under-represented patterns, known as anti-motifs. We found commonly occurred motifs and anti-motifs are remarkably characterized by different structures matching certain functions in knowledge exchanges. Collaboration patterns represented by motifs favor hierarchical structures, supporting intensive interactions across academic generations. Anti-motifs are more likely to show chain-like structures, hindering potentially various knowledge activities, and are thus seldom found in real collaboration networks. These findings provide new insights into the understanding of funded collaborations and also the funding system. Meanwhile, our findings are helpful for researchers, the public and policymakers to gain knowledge on research(ers) evolution, particularly in terms of primordial collaboration patterns. 相似文献
8.
在经济转型与技术创新改革发展新阶段,构建跨功能团队成为组织获得持续竞争优势的关键路径,开发与培养跨功能团队创造力也因此受到学术界与企业界的广泛关注。通过对西安高新技术开发区软件园内27家中小科技型企业的75个跨功能团队的深入调研,将内隐协调引入个体—组织匹配与跨功能团队创造力关系中,探讨个体—组织匹配对跨功能团队创造力的影响机制,并将内部人身份感知作为调节变量进行实证分析。结果表明:个体—组织匹配度越好、内隐协调水平越高,越容易激发跨功能团队创造力;个体—组织匹配通过内隐协调对跨功能团队创造力的影响效果显著;成员内部人身份感知程度越高,内隐协调在个体—组织匹配与跨功能团队创造力之间的中介作用越强。据此,提出了跨功能团队创造力提升的针对性建议。 相似文献
9.
团队已经成为动态环境下企业从事研发活动的基本工作单元,而影响研发团队成员创新行为的主要因素一直是研究者关注的热点。以企业中的研发团队为研究对象,将创新气氛纳入到研发主管目标取向对研发员工创新行为影响的研究中,并推导一个多层次研究框架。通过对74个研发团队(74名研发主管,472名研发员工)的调查分析,并运用多层线性模型进行跨层次分析,得出实证研究结果：研发主管发展员工目标取向对研发员工创新行为有显著正向影响,主管回避失败目标取向对员工创新行为具有显著负向影响,而主管能力证明目标取向对员工创新行为的负向影响不显著;分析结果还表明,团队创新气氛在研发主管目标取向对创新行为的影响过程中起到部分中介作用。最后讨论了本研究的管理启示、研究局限及研究展望。 相似文献
10.
整合团队任务、情感自反性与产品创新理论,探索团队任务自反性对产品创新绩效的影响,团队情感自反性对任务自反性与产品创新绩效之间关系的调节作用,以及贫缺、凝固、失谐和适配四种团队状态产品创新绩效的差异性。利用长三角地区76个研发团队的实证数据表明:团队任务自反性与产品创新绩效显著正相关;团队情感自反性对任务自反性与产品创新绩效之间的关系具有显著调节作用;适配状态产品创新绩效明显高于贫缺、凝固和失谐状态产品创新绩效,而贫缺、凝固和失谐状态产品创新绩效并无显著差异。 相似文献
11.
时间压力已经成为研发团队最常见的一种压力方式,通过对186个有效团队的调查,以时间压力性质为视角,探讨了不同性质的时间压力对团队创新绩效的作用机制。研究发现：(1)挑战性时间压力对研发团队的团队反思、团队创新绩效均有显著正相关,阻碍性时间压力对研发团队的团队反思、团队创新绩效均有显著负相关;(2)团队反思分别在挑战性时间压力与团队创新绩效、阻碍性时间压力与团队创新绩效之间起中介作用;(3)时间领导会正向调节挑战性时间压力与团队反思的关系,即较高水平的时间领导下,挑战性时间压力对团队反思的积极作用效果越好,时间领导也会负向调节阻碍性时间压力与团队反思之间的关系,即较高水平的时间领导下,阻碍性时间压力对团队反思的抑制作用会弱化。 相似文献
12.
高水平创新型团队是我国人才队伍建设的重点,而创新型团队创新能力的发挥又离不开有效的评价和激励。通过文献分析和国内外创新团队案例分析,从创新环境、创新投入、创新产出以及创新潜能四个维度构建高水平创新团队创新能力评价指标体系。利用DS证据合成理论,以江苏省欧阳平凯院士生物工程创新团队为例,对高水平创新团队的创新能力进行实证研究。研究发现,当前高水平创新型团队的创新能力总体处于“好”,但仍存在团队突出人才缺乏、科研资助力度较小、科研创新能力不足和人才搭配不当等问题。 相似文献
13.
14.
在网络虚拟品牌社区（OUIC）前端创新环节,企业是否参与、何时参与、如何参与知识创造管理不仅会影响到企业的产品创新绩效,甚至会影响企业在市场中的核心竞争力。本研究选择具有一定高新技术信息支撑的家电电器行业OUIC为研究背景,引入创意组合管理（IPM）为研究的核心变量,通过构建不同创意主题发布模式（B端创意主题与C端创意主题）与不同前端创新阶段（创意产生阶段与创意发展阶段）的2×2组间设计来验证相关命题。结果表明,针对不同创意主题社区,企业采取的不同决策行为,对产品创新绩效均存在显著差异。（1）证明了不同创意主题发布模式（B端创意主题或C端创意主题）,会对用户的知识创造力产生差异性影响。B端创意主题（企业主导发布）,企业可以引导社区用户重点进行新产品核心子系统相关创意的开发;C端创意主题（用户主导发布）,企业可以引导社区用户重点进行新产品周边子系统相关创意的开发。（2）验证了在用户参与OUIC 前端创新环节知识创造过程中,企业实施创意组合管理（IPM）对用户知识创造力与产品创新绩效产生的正面显著效果。（3）验证了用户参与OUIC前端创新环节知识创造过程中,企业对用户创新行为的最佳干预时机。在B端创意主题（企业主导发布）下,企业在创意产生阶段（第一阶段）实施创意组合管理（IPM）为最佳导入时机;C端创意主题（用户主导发布）下,企业在创意发展阶段（第二阶段）实施创意组合管理（IPM）为最佳导入时机。研究在理论上不仅丰富和完善了虚拟经济营销管理相关理论,而且在应用上有助于企业利用互联网工具为产品创新发掘新的途径,并培育企业市场核心竞争力。 相似文献
15.
科研创新团队是国家创新体系的核心组织单元,是构成国家创新能力的微观基础。本文以我国1352个科研创新团队为研究对象,采用循证式评估方法针对团队负责人及团队骨干成员设计问卷调查,从基本情况、组成结构、运行机制、产出绩效、政策支持作用等方面系统评估了我国科研创新团队的发展状况,总结了团队发展的经验。结合对143个团队的深度访谈,本文发现,在长期合作的基础上自然形成,拥有出色的学术带头人并形成结构合理的学术梯队,具备较强的研究能力和较好的研发条件,孕育形成优良的科研文化,构建了健全的规章制度和高效的运行机制,是优秀团队形成的重要条件。针对存在的突出问题,本文提出了进一步改进和完善我国科研创新团队支持政策的若干建议,包括加快落实中央财政科技计划的人才基地专项、加强对科研创新团队建设的引导、改进团队支持计划的经费管理、优化组织与运行机制等,为国家改进对科研创新团队的支持政策和计划提供了重要参考。 相似文献
16.
本研究通过问卷调研方法探索创业团队异质性对创新绩效影响的边界条件。基于长三角地区97家创业企业的调研数据,分析结果表明：（1）战略共识正向调节团队异质性对创新绩效的影响;（2）团队凝聚力正向调节团队异质性对创新绩效的影响;（3）战略共识与团队凝聚力对团队异质性和创新绩效的关系有联合调节作用,当战略共识与团队凝聚力都高时,团队异质性对创新绩效的积极作用增强。本研究对创业团队异质性影响创新绩效的边界条件进行探讨,对相关理论做出补充,同时也为创业团队提高创新绩效提供对策和建议。 相似文献
17.
Innovation increasingly relies on collaboration in teams instead of individual efforts. Although the advantages of teams for innovating are virtually undisputed, we have only a very rudimentary understanding of their success drivers. To shed more light on innovation teams, we conceptualize multiplicity in expertise as nonredundant expertise and distinguish it from factors that facilitate or hinder the integration of this expertise. These factors are overlap in expertise, disparity in team members’ status, and whether or not teams use automation technology. We use the empirical context of molecular biology, especially the part of this field in which teams produce and exchange genetic material in the form of so-called plasmids. Combining data about plasmids from a central plasmid repository (AddGene) with bibliometric data endows us with a rich dataset capturing information about team diversity in addition to two innovation performance measures (the number of plasmid orders and the number of citations attracted by publications). Our analysis shows that multiplicity in expertise increases innovation performance; this relationship is strengthened by the overlap in expertise and weakened by disparity in status and the use of the automation technology. Our paper provides a more detailed theory of expertise diversity and contributes to the diversity literature. Our findings also lead to implications for practitioners. 相似文献
18.
集体心理所有权影响创业团队绩效的机制研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
“双创”背景下如何提高创业团队绩效与促进创业成功受到社会各界的普遍关注。文章基于群体心理学相关理论观点,运用SPSS21.0及MPLUS7.0对国内173家创业团队的样本数据进行分析,探讨了集体心理所有权与创业团队绩效之间的中介机制与边界条件。研究发现：创业团队中集体心理所有权对团队学习和创业团队绩效均具有正向影响;团队学习在集体心理所有权与创业团队绩效间具有部分中介作用;团队任务相互依赖在两者的中介机制中具有负向调节作用：团队任务相互依赖越高,集体心理所有权对团队学习与创业团队绩效的正向影响越弱,团队学习在集体心理所有权与创业团队绩效之间的中介作用越弱。本研究提供了从集体心理所有权与团队任务设计角度提高创业团队绩效的有效路径。 相似文献
19.
科研团队的多样性对团队绩效的影响研究 《科学学研究》2021,39(6):1074-1083
虚拟化、综合化、多元化趋势是科研团队在新一轮科技革命中的重要特征,研究新趋势下影响科研团队绩效的因素对科技工作者的未来发展以及国家科技创新实力的提升具有重大意义。在广泛的文献调研基础上,探讨团队规模、团队成员机构多样性、国别多样性、跨学科性、资金来源丰富性以及团队不稳定性六个因素对科研团队绩效（学术论文产出数量与产出质量）的影响,并通过实证分析予以验证。研究表明：科研团队产出数量与团队规模、机构多样性、资金来源丰富性正相关,与国别多样性、跨学科性和团队不稳定性负相关;产出质量与资金来源的丰富性正相关,与机构多样性负相关。 相似文献
20.
增强高校科研创新团队内部知识转移绩效时于提高组织学习能力、促进组织蓬勃发展具有重要意义.通过来自于江苏省高校科研创新团队成员的136份有效问卷调查,从知识特性、情境特征、知识源特征、知识接收者特征四个方面,实证研究了高校科研创新团队内部知识转移的关键影响因素.经过统计检验,验证了知识因果模糊性、学习文化、制度支持、知识源沟通编码能力、知识接收者沟通解码能力、吸收能力、团队规模、团队结构对于高校科研创新团队内部知识转移绩效的显著性影响.通过识别关键影响因素,提供管理策略,以促进知识转移绩效和知识创新. 相似文献