共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 133 毫秒
1.
2.
陈颖 《图书馆理论与实践》2010,(1)
开放获取作为一种新的学术出版与交流模式,在有效提高学术信息交流效率的同时,大大降低了学术文章出版的费用。开放获取期刊相较于传统纸本期刊虽成本有所降低,但仍需要资金和人力的支持,且资金日益成为开放获取期刊长期有效运转的关键因素。本文首先分析了开放获取期刊的成本构成;进而分析总结了其资金来源;最后对资金来源中的争议问题进行探讨。 相似文献
3.
李麟 《图书情报工作动态》2007,(10):6-15
开放获取（Open Access，OA）与机构知识库（Institutional repositories，IR）正在改变着学术信息交流方式，为研究人员、图书馆员、出版商、研究资助机构带来了新的机遇和挑战。开放社会协会（Open Society Institute，OSI）及其所属的图书馆电子信息联盟（electmnic information for libraries,elFL）设立了开放获取计划推动开放获取的实施，且每年在不同地点举办会议研讨、交流开放获取进展，推动和促进全世界开放获取事业。 相似文献
4.
信息资源是和能源、材料同等重要的战略资源，教育和科研以信息为基础。学术期刊是进行学术信息交流的重地，是研究人员开展研究和发表研究成果的重要工具。然而，随着近来学术期刊价格的上涨，传统的学术期刊出版模式严重影响了学术交流和知识传播，人们开始转向利用互联网来传播学术科研成果。于是，国际科技界、学术界、出版界、信息传播界发起了开放获取（OpenAccess，简称为OA）运动，希望以此促进科学信息的广泛传播、促进学术信息的交流与出版、提升科学研究的公共利用程度、保障科学信息的长期保存。 相似文献
5.
科技信息的开放获取已成为影响学术信息交流与科学发展的重大问题，深刻地影响到科技政策、科技支撑环境发展战略和科技信息服务模式。一大批科学家、科研机构和许多国家的科学管理与科研资助机构，都积极地推动科技信息的开放获取。他们或者制定开放获取政策、要求或鼓励科研人员提供科研成果的开放获取，或者支持开放出版期刊，或者建立机构开放存储库、支持本机构科研成果开放获取。通过这一系列的措施，科学界希望能够促进科研成果不受限制地广泛传播和自由获取、以及促进科研成果通过公共机制长期可靠保存和利用，以保障科技知识资产的国家保护和科研机构的知识资产管理。 相似文献
6.
信息服务新理念——利用开放获取为读者提供多元化信息服务 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
开放获取是在网络环境中发展起来的新型学术信息交流理念和交流机制.本文分析了开放获取为图书馆信息服务带来的影响,以及如何利用开放获取为读者提供多元化的信息服务. 相似文献
7.
开放获取出版模式研究 总被引：24，自引：1，他引：24
开放获取是一种新的学术出版与交流模式，与传统期刊出版在办刊理念、运作模式、编审过程、经费来源、版权问题以及期刊评价等方面均有很大的不同。文章论述了开放获取出版模式的意义和特点，对中国出版界推动和实施开放获取出版提出了政策建议。 相似文献
8.
2013年国际开放获取实践进展 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
通过跟踪2013年世界重要科研资助机构、科研机构、政府部门、出版机构的开放获取政策、研究报告和动态消息,从开放获取政策、开放出版实践、开放获取知识库的发展趋势以及新的开放获取学术信息交流模式（如开放数据和开放获取图书）等方面总结2013年国际开放获取实践方面的具体进展。 相似文献
9.
探索开放获取背景下学术信息交流场域用户角色的演变,有利于图书馆等信息服务机构改进信息服务方式、提高信息服务效率等。运用学术交流和场域等相关理论,诠释开放获取背景下学术信息交流场域用户角色演变的关键影响因素,并分析其角色演变的主要特征。在开放获取背景下,学术信息交流场域用户的科研惯习及用户之间的协作关系发生演变,动摇了学术信息交流场域中资本和权力的分配结构,形成以用户为中心的动态交互场;图书馆、情报中心等信息服务机构密切跟踪和关注用户的角色演变,可以有针对性地改进信息服务方式,与用户一起实现场域共赢。 相似文献
10.
11.
This article reports on scholarly communication and open access (OA) in Korea. Drawing on a range of databases, articles, and reference sources, it provides unique insights. In contrast to the UK/US model of scholarly communication, in Korea, most scholarly journals are published by discipline‐based scholarly societies and research institutes affiliated to universities. Payment for publication is the norm, and typically features article processing charges and scholarly society membership fees for both OA and toll access (TA) journals. Online access to journals in Korea is provided by commercial vendors who enter into contracts with the scholarly societies for exclusive use. Three online access models apply – TA, gold OA, and dual access – with the use of these models varying between disciplines. In parallel with this access provided by commercial vendors, there are a number of government‐funded open access repositories (OARs) to which university researchers are requested to deposit their research outputs, as well as OARs run by universities and other research institutes. 相似文献
12.
国外大学图书馆开放获取实践概述 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
大学是学术交流中的一支活跃力量,随着开放获取影响的日益扩大,大学图书馆与开放获取的关系更加紧密。国外大学图书馆在推动开放获取发展,应对学术交流变革的进程中,在大学校园内创新性地采取了一系列举措。这些成功举措包括图书馆员积极推动校园开放获取政策出台,并为政策的顺利推行提供不可替代的服务;图书馆摈弃信息看门人的信息交流末端角色,直接参与到学术出版环节;图书馆员重视加强自我教育;图书馆有很好的组织性,图书馆联盟机制为图书馆高效运作和开辟未来发展空间发挥了巨大作用;大学图书馆面对学术交流体系的巨大变革,也清醒地认识到大学图书馆未来发展战略需要做出重要调整。 相似文献
13.
《Journal of Informetrics》2007,1(3):239-248
The last few years have seen the emergence of several open access options in scholarly communication which can broadly be grouped into two areas referred to as ‘gold’ and ‘green’ open access (OA). In this article we review the literature examining the relationship between OA status and citation counts of scholarly articles. Early studies showed a correlation between the free online availability or OA status of articles and higher citation counts, and implied causality without due consideration of potential confounding factors. More recent investigations have dissected the nature of the relationship between article OA status and citations. Three non-exclusive postulates have been proposed to account for the observed citation differences between OA and non-OA articles: an open access postulate, a selection bias postulate, and an early view postulate. The most rigorous study to date (in condensed matter physics) showed that, after controlling for the early view postulate, the remaining difference in citation counts between OA and non-OA articles is explained by the selection bias postulate. No evidence was found to support the OA postulate per se; i.e. article OA status alone has little or no effect on citations. Further studies using a similarly rigorous approach are required to determine the generality of this finding. 相似文献
14.
Bryna Coonin 《Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship》2013,18(3):193-212
Open access (OA) publishing is now accepted as an integral part of the emerging trends within scholarly communication. Business librarians, like their subject specialist colleagues in other disciplines, are increasingly called upon to interpret scholarly communication trends to their faculty. This study surveys 1,293 business faculty from American schools of business accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. Issues explored include business faculty publishing practices within the discipline and how these affect academic advancement, obtaining articles for their own research, electronic publishing, self-archiving, and their perceptions about OA publishing generally. 相似文献
15.
Stephen PINFIELD 《Learned Publishing》2009,22(3):165-175
It is now widely accepted that there are two routes to open access (OA): OA repositories and OA journals. It is often assumed these are distinct alternative parallel tracks. However, it has recently become clear that there is potential for repositories and journals to interact with each other on an ongoing basis and between them to form a coherent OA scholarly communication system. This paper puts forward three possible models of interaction between repositories and journals; services such as arXiv and PubMed Central, and the work carried out by the RIOJA project, are working exemplars and pilot implementations of these models. The key issues associated with the widespread adoption of these models include repository infrastructure development; changing ideas of the ‘journal’, ‘article’, and ‘publication’; version management; quality assurance; business and funding models; developing value‐added features; content preservation; policy frameworks; and changing roles and cultures within the research community. 相似文献
16.
开放存取思想迎合了网络时代信息交流的特点,开创了一种新的、高效的交流模式。开放存取包含两层含义:一是指学术信息免费向公众开放;二是指学术信息的可获得性。网络环境下的学术信息开放存取服务有多种类型,如:在线文档发布、科学家与研究组内部的直接交流、通过电子邮件的自由辩论、搜索引擎的索引与检索服务、第三方集成检索服务等。图3。参考文献10。 相似文献
17.
18.
The proposal we offer here (and in the more extensive ‘white paper’ proposal on which this article is based) tackles head‐on the open access (OA) business models that have proven particularly problematic for implementation of OA in the humanities and social sciences (HSS). Our proposal suggests all tertiary institutions contribute to systemic support of the research process itself, including its entire scholarly output. A bold rethinking of the economics of OA by way of partnerships among scholarly societies and academic libraries funded by an institutional fee structure based on a student‐and‐faculty per‐capita sliding scale, our plan is nevertheless intentionally incremental. Our proposal focuses first on HSS and primarily in the United States, but just as research and scholarship are increasingly global and collaborative, our plan is not bound by discipline or national borders, but can be adopted by all those looking for a more equitable and sustainable OA model. 相似文献
19.
Cy Dillon 《College & Undergraduate Libraries》2013,20(1):121-126
This is the first in a series of columns intended to report on the progress of the Open Access (OA) movement in scholarly communication, chart the changes OA brings to the methods libraries and library users employ to acquire information, and estimate the value of OA materials for undergraduate library collections. At this point, it is not clear how long commercially published academic journals will be a sine qua non for college libraries. However, it is already obvious that undergraduate instruction can benefit from the scholarship available through Open Access at the same time that our libraries need the budget relief such resources offer. Librarians who work with undergraduates have very good reasons to stay current with the range and quality of OA content as well as with the best means of providing access to that body of scholarship. In addition, faculty teaching undergraduates depend upon librarians to keep them informed about changes in the information environment. With that in mind, “Out in the Open” is an attempt to introduce readers to the people, resources, and trends identified with the rise of Open Access. 相似文献
20.
不同学术出版模式的特征及其影响研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
随着学术交流方式的演变,传统学术出版模式已经不能有效服务于学术信息的交流和传播,导致不同学术出版模式的产生。学者们的深入研究发现当前情况下出版模式还不可能完全转变,实现理想中的免费且无限制的模式,因此,订阅出版、开放存取和自存档三种学术出版模式并存的同时,还产生了一些混合模式和可选择模式。文章在系统分析订阅出版,开放存取和自存档三种学术出版模式的特征之后,从宏观角度探讨了不同学术出版模式对科研和社会经济产生的影响,并从访问和许可两个角度分析了不同学术出版模式的影响因素和影响机制。该文为2009年第六期“医学OA期刊”专题文章之一。 相似文献