共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 250 毫秒
1.
开放存取期刊版权问题分析 总被引：6，自引：1，他引：6
开放存取期刊是实现开放存取的另一种途径。开放存取期刊作为新生事物有别于传统期刊模式,它的出版模式、发展模式等一系列问题需要进一步的研究和探讨,本文就开放存取期刊的版权问题进行了分析探讨。 相似文献
2.
学术期刊开放存取(Open Access)模式约略可分为四种:"直接开放存取"、"延迟性开放存取"、"部分开放存取"及"复合式开放存取"。本研究以此四种归类执行台湾人文与社会学期刊开放存取模式之主编调查与"复合式开放存取"政策访谈,相较于欧美之发展,2013年研究发现台湾人文与社会学的开放存取期刊模式并非主要型态,社会学类期刊尤为明显。问题显现台湾学者与政府对开放存取期刊政策不明朗,这对于学术出版产业与学界而言,利弊互见。 相似文献
3.
国内外"开放存取"研究综述 总被引：39，自引：0，他引：39
“开放存取(OPEN ACESS)”基于“自由、开放与共享”的理念,依托网络技术,正在成为学术出版和科学信息交流的全新模式。本文着眼于学术信息交流障碍与网络技术两个方面,介绍了开放存取出现的背景;并结合已有的研究成果,分析了开放存取发展的历程,认为对开放存取的发展进行阶段划分为时尚早,至少是一种对“理念”与“模式”的概念不很清楚的表现;文章引证国际上权威机构的著名文献界定了开放存取的内容,并对开放存取的实现途径进行了探讨,认为开放存取期刊和开放存取仓储的创办具有发展前景,指出开放存取出版物的质量问题、运行经费问题、知识产权问题、合作建设与标准化问题等是开放存取中存在的主要问题;文章最后指出,作为传统学术出版模式的强有力的竞争对手,开放存取在国内外同行的关注下一定会取得长足进展。 相似文献
4.
本文基于开放存取的起源、发展及特点,讨论了开放存取作为新的出版模式,对于促进科研成果传播和科技期刊发展的重要意义,并针对中国科技期刊出版开放存取的发展特点以及存在的问题提出了开放存取出版实现模式、经费来源和期刊国际化的相关建议. 相似文献
5.
文章阐述了开放存取期刊模式的内涵,分析了开放存取期刊模式对高校图书馆期刊管理工作产生的重要影响,指出开放存取期刊模式下高校图书馆期刊管理工作的不足并提出改进策略. 相似文献
6.
本研究以开放获取的建设模式入手,将当前各国学术论文的开放获取实践平台分为开放存取仓储平台建设和开放存取期刊平台建设,并针对各个国家的学术论文开放存取实践进行统一的梳理。然后对各个国家平台建设的推动力量和国家的政策导向加以分析。本研究认为,图书馆、科研机构等是开放存取平台建设的推动力量,在开放存取平台建设过程中的重要性不容忽视;开放存取的金色模式和绿色模式两种运作模式的选择需要考虑平台建设所处的具体环境;准确的平台性质和学科定位对后期开放存取平台的竞争力来说有一定的影响意义。 相似文献
7.
分析了开放存取的技术背景以及国内外开放存取的发展现状,指出学术期刊开展开放存取的误区及根源,最后构建了独立自主的开放存取平台门户运营模式,应通过角色转变,权益结合,制定开放存取的技术标准,确定开放存取的行为规范等校正误区,吸引更多的出版机构和用户参与。 相似文献
8.
开放资源环境下高校图书馆发展探讨 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
文章介绍了开放存取的概念、产生背景、实现模式及特点,从5个方面归纳分析了开放存取对高校图书馆产生的影响,并进一步探讨了高校图书馆在开放存取环境下的发展路径。 相似文献
9.
开放存取出版——网络时代学术出版的创新 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
开放存取出版被认为是网络时代学术出版的新模式,从出版流程、付费模式、版权问题几方面比较了传统学术出版与开放存取出版之间的差异,分析了开放存取出版所具有的优势,介绍了传统学术出版商实现开放存取出版的具体策略.参考文献7. 相似文献
10.
开放存取对图书馆信息资源建设的影响 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
杨桂莲 《图书馆工作与研究》2009,(11)
近年来,开放存取作为一种全新的出版模式、学术信息资源交流模式和理念不断受到重视.本文从对开放存取的定义与现状的分析入手,论述了开放存取给图书馆的信息资源建设带来的影响及应对策略. 相似文献
11.
国外学术交流开放存取发展综述 总被引：70，自引：1，他引：69
介绍开放存取的含义、基本特征、发展背景,说明其对传统学术交流过程的变革、与信息资源共享的关系,并对国外学术交流开放存取的发展过程予以梳理,最后分析开放存取对我国学术交流的启示。 相似文献
12.
学术信息开放存取与图书馆服务 总被引：12，自引：0，他引：12
本文介绍了学术信息开放存取的发展现状，分析了学术信息开放存取对图书馆期刊采访、协调采购和传统服务带来的影响，探讨了图书馆在开放存取环境下应对的策略及应发挥的作用。 相似文献
13.
Open access publishing is now an accepted method of scholarly communication. However, the greatest traction for open access publishing thus far has been in the sciences. Penetration of open access publishing has been much slower among the social sciences. This study surveys 309 authors from recent issues of open access journals in education to determine why they choose to publish in open access journals and to gain insight into the ways publishing practices within the discipline itself impact the willingness of authors to engage in open access publishing. 相似文献
14.
Authors and Open Access： Effective Ways to Achieve OA in China 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
Although there are effective methods available to authors for providing open access to their work, more than half are still not doing so and provision in China is poorer than in many other countries. There are a number of issues and concerns that dissuade authors from making their work open access ： some are still unaware of the concept and of the increased visibility and impact that open access brings; many are unfamiliar with open access journals and how they work; many are uninformed about self-archiving and for some of those who are aware of the possibility of providing open access by this means, concerns about copyright and technical issues remain. Yet all these worries can be addressed with simple facts that reassure and encourage authors to adopt open access to benefit themselves, their research and their teaching. There is also a wealth of resources now available to authors that provide information and advice on open access and its effects. As institutions and research funders, both with a strong interest in maximising the visibility and impact of research they support, begin to develop formal policies on open access, models for its provision are emerging. The optimal model is a network of institution-based open access repositories from which content can be harvested by open access search engines （ the basic＇ no frills＇ variant） or by service providers who add functionality or selectivity to provide users with value-enhanced products. 相似文献
15.
开放获取的发展与推动因素 总被引：15，自引：2，他引：15
开放获取发展的历史不长，但显示出强劲的发展势头，得到了学术界、高等院校、专业团体、图书馆、基金会、国际组织、以及期刊出版商和有关方面的热情关注和广泛支持。这些不同方面的因素在推动开放获取中发挥着不同的作用，共同促进了开放获取的发展。文章总结分析了这些不同的方面在推动开放获取方面所发挥的促进作用和所产生的积极影响。 相似文献
16.
研究者希望提高论著的网络可见性来提升其学术影响。图书馆从引文分析方法、自存档及开放存取期刊形式、出版者选择等方面,通过图书馆网站或面对面咨询的途径,为研究者提供可操作的实践指导。 相似文献
17.
Claire Creaser 《New Review of Academic Librarianship》2013,19(1):4-25
This paper presents the results of two complementary surveys undertaken in 2008 as part of a wider project investigating the effects and impact of open access to research outputs in the UK. The institutional view, from a survey of academic librarians, is compared to researchers' perceptions and practices. Researchers were largely unaware of their institutions' policies with regard to open access, or whether they had an institutional repository. Reasons for making research outputs available on open access, or not doing so, were sought, and the role of open access material as a research resource investigated. The surveys found that many researchers maintained a suspicion of open access publications, both as authors and as users of scholarly material, together with a degree of ignorance about open access and the role of institutional repositories. This suggests that a degree of culture change may be needed, as institutions develop repositories with a view to future research assessment requirements, and more funders adopt open access mandates for the outputs from research which they fund. 相似文献
18.
Symphony Bruce 《International Information and Library Review》2013,45(3):236-243
AbstractThis column discusses information literacy instruction through the lens of open access (OA) to better serve researchers who have limited access to scholarship due to cost. After providing a definition of OA, the benefit of OA is exemplified through both researchers who lose access to information, like students, and those who have little access to begin with, like researchers in disenfranchised locations. Information literacy instruction librarians who teach the use of OA resources increase awareness for global researchers, ensure alumni access to scholarship after loss of institutional affiliation, and increase scholarship published in OA mediums, supporting those without traditional access. 相似文献
19.
MartaMestrovicDeyrup MarthaFallahayLoesch 《图书情报工作》2005,49(6):37-44
National and institutional policies on open access are not yet fully established in the United States because of the manner in which the open access movement has evolved. In this report, the authors illustrate how the open access movement has evolved within each community libraries, universities, publishing companies, government agencies, the professoriate, public interest groups, and the U.S. Congress and note what trends now are beginning to emerge. 相似文献
20.
David Nicholas Anthony Watkinson Abdullah Abrizah Blanca Rodríguez‐Bravo Cherifa Boukacem‐Zeghmouri Jie Xu Marzena
wigo&#x; Eti Herman 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(2):132-141
A study from the Harbingers research project provides a comprehensive assessment of the main features of the scholarly communications system as viewed by early career researchers (ECRs) in the final year of the study (2018). Aspects covered are: discovery and access, authorship practices, peer review, publishing strategies, open access publishing, open data, sharing, collaboration, social media, metrics, impact, reputation, libraries, publishers, and scholarly transformations. Nearly 120 science and social science researchers from seven countries were questioned about these 16 aspects. It was found that some scholarly features work well for ECRs, and in this category can be included: discovery and access, authorship practices, sharing, collaboration, and publishers. Reputation, publishing strategies, and impact are more problematical, and they, in turn, cause tensions regarding some other factors – social media, open access, and open data. Of the rest, libraries are largely invisible, and ECRs have conflicting views concerning ethical behaviour. Few envisage that transformational change will take place in the next 5 years. 相似文献