首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
对科技期刊出版过程中若干问题进行了探讨,涉及到校对流程中的通读、参考文献的著录、插图在文中的位置、表内一字线与空白的注释、“卷终”字样在卷末期的标注、外文目次表页码和各卷(期)正文连续页码的确定等问题,并提出了合理的建议。  相似文献   

2.
吕赛英  王维朗 《编辑学报》2013,25(2):133-134
为更好地实现期刊目次表编排的规范化,抽样调查124种科技期刊(学术类74种,技术类50种)执行GB/T13417—2009《期刊目次表》的情况,分析了目次表编排中存在的问题:没有"目次"名称或名称写为"目录"、未列出或未列全文章著者,以及刊登广告的期刊未单列广告目次等。提出了实施GB/T 13417—2009的对策与建议。  相似文献   

3.
正《编辑学报》2014年第1期有如下2处差错:1)目次表《理论研究》栏内"学术论文中的引文失范问题刍"应为"学术论文中的引文失范问题刍议";2)第59页地脚注"教育部科技发展中专项研究资助课题"应为"教育部科技发展专项研究资助课题"。特此更正,并向作者、读者致歉!  相似文献   

4.
为了解科技期刊目次表中责任者项的著录现状,提高目次表的编校质量,对400本科技期刊进行了调查.以GB/T13417-2009《期刊目次表》为依据,对调查结果进行了分析.发现:符合标准规定列出了全部责任者的期刊,中文目次表占54.8%,英文目次表占48.8%;英文目次表中责任者的汉语拼音姓名标注正确的期刊仅占48.4%.这提示科技期刊编辑,认真学习、执行GB/T 13417-2009,做好对责任者项的正确著录,是自己义不容辞的责任.  相似文献   

5.
科技期刊论文题名在目次表中排序的影响因素   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
论文在科技期刊目次表中的排序是期刊编排要考虑的主要问题之一,也是一个较敏感的问题。对目次表中论文题名排序的影响因素进行较全面的分析,有利于增强科技期刊编排的合理性。  相似文献   

6.
张同学 《编辑学报》2020,32(1):43-45
为了提高科技期刊编辑对政治性差错的感性认识,引起科技期刊编辑的重视,避免各种类型政治性差错的发生,收集整理了源自中国科学引文数据库来源期刊的一些有代表性的政治性差错。科技期刊中的政治性差错貌似细小,实则严重。科技期刊中的政治性差错存在于科技论文的各个部分,包括题名、作者单位、正文、插图、表格、参考文献等。科技期刊中的政治性差错涵盖了所有类型的政治性差错。  相似文献   

7.
科技期刊目次表的标准化问题   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
李军  郭子静  董时军 《编辑学报》2004,16(2):113-113
为了了解科技期刊在目次表编排方面执行国家标准的情况,笔者按照GB/T 317992和GB/T 1341792的相关要求对国家图书馆收藏的100种中文科技期刊样刊的目次表进行了随机抽样调查.  相似文献   

8.
出版业有把图书中正文以外的部分,如前言、后记、序跋文字、参考书目、对照表等部分统称为“辅文”。这一名称是相对与正文而言的。《出版词典》(上海辞书出版社版)的“辅文”条目是这样说的:“书籍中正文的附属文字。多数置于正文前后,夹注和夹诠之类则随附于正文。包括题字、目次、凡例、前言、序言、出版  相似文献   

9.
通过与传统的文字目次的对比,论述科技期刊图像目次的主题性、可视性、美学性和选择性特征以及选择目次图像的原则,给出了目次图像的选择方式,明确了作者在选择目次图像中的主导作用及编者的协同作用。  相似文献   

10.
质量是期刊的生命,多年来我深刻体会到,用辩证思想指导质量控制工作,可收到事半功倍的效果。1重点与非重点期刊出版前的审查工作与编辑加工不同,涉及的学科面广、量大、时间急、经验要求高。如何做好这项工作,笔者认为应抓重点。审查的重点是直接影响期刊质量且易忽视的问题。1·1关系到著作权方面的问题目次页、版权页和正文中作者姓名、单位等涉及到著作权的问题不容忽视。①作者姓名。要保证每一位作者的姓名在正文中和目次页中统一并正确无误。常见的错误有:原稿出现作者姓名错误,如有的学生来稿把导师姓名写错;目次页作者移位,即上篇的…  相似文献   

11.
国内外生物和农林类科技论文的信息特征差异   总被引:2,自引:1,他引:1  
从31种国内外生物和农林类学术性科技期刊中各取2004年第1期上的科技论文进行信息特征的统计分析.结果表明,国外期刊的论文篇幅大,所列参考文献数量多.这是由于其结果部分的分量比国内期刊重所引起的.此外,国外期刊论文中用来阐明每个图表的文字也比较多.对我国与国外科技期刊论文存在差距的原因进行了分析.  相似文献   

12.
萨蕾  温泉 《图书馆》2012,(3):95-98
本文介绍了网络环境下产生于各种制作主体的目次数据的特征,阐述了图书馆进行中文图书目次数据建设的方式及利弊,介绍了国际上以图书馆界共建及跨行业合作两种形式进行书目数据建设的发展情况,在此基础上,提出以书目数据共建平台为依托,整合各方力量进行目次数据建设的方案。  相似文献   

13.
科技论文图表题名中错例分析   总被引:9,自引:4,他引:5  
马建华 《编辑学报》2007,19(3):187-188
举例说明科技论文中4种常见的图表题名的错误与不规范,包括:1)内容缺乏专指性;2)与图表内容重复;3)与图表内容不符;4)中英文题名不一致.并给出了它们的正确表达形式.  相似文献   

14.
面向科技文献的多模态语义关联特征提取与表达体系研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
科技文献资源是一种多模态数据,除文本信息外,还包含丰富的图像、表格、公式、音频、视频等多种模态的信息,有利于用户充分理解科技文献资源中的知识。该文把多模态思想引入科技文献的语义表示方面,对科技文献中的图像、表格和公式信息进行语义分析,与文本信息共同表示文献语义内容,通过科技文献中多种模态信息的语义表示及相互关系完善科技文献内容的语义化表示,发展刻画科技文献对象多态性的表达体系。  相似文献   

15.
Compared with journal articles, books can provide broader, deeper and more comprehensive information, and often have higher expertise and academic depth. However, most researches on book assessment focus on measuring academic value of books (e.g. citations analysis) or identifying attitudes of readers (e.g. book review mining), depth and breadth reflected by book contents is neglected. Therefore, in this paper, we measure books’ depth and breadth by mining books’ tables of contents, so as to enrich resources and methods for book assessment research, help users understand book contents quickly and improve efficiency of book selection. Specifically, we measured books’ depth and breadth based on books’ tables of contents via two levels: topic level and feature level. Firstly, we obtained topic-level metrics by identifying topics expressed in tables of contents and calculating topic distributions. Then, we got feature-level results via feature extraction and feature distribution calculation. Finally, we compared depth and breadth metrics and other book assessment metrics. Experimental results reveal that, books’ depth and breadth at two levels are different, and substantial differences between disciplines and book types are obvious. In addition, books’ depth and breadth can provide alternative and supplementary information for assessing multi-dimensional values of books.  相似文献   

16.
论述了图书目次的数据库结构、图书目次处理软件的主要功能模块及基于. N et 技术实现这些功能模块的技术思路和具体方法, 最后还讨论了在实现该软件过程中出现的几个争议性问题。  相似文献   

17.
OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the presence of online tables of contents (TOC) in an online catalog affects circulation (checkouts and inhouse usage). Two major questions were posed: (1) did the presence of online tables of contents for books increase use, and, (2) if it did, what factors might cause the increase? METHOD: A randomized and stratified design was used in tracking usage of 3,957 book titles that were previously divided into two groups: one with TOC and one without TOC. Stratification was done for year of imprint, location, subject, previous use, circulating or non-circulating status, and presence of TOC. The use was tracked by the online catalog statistics in the InnoPac online catalog for fourteen months. RESULTS: The study found that tables of contents do increase usage. It also showed a correlation in the size of the effect based on the currency of the titles. In general, even after adjusting for all of the variables (publication date, location, circulation status, subject, and previous use), the odds of a title being used increased by 45% if the titles had online tables of contents, a statistically significant impact at the 0.05 level. CONCLUSIONS: This case-control study presents new information about the impact on circulation and inhouse use when tables of contents for books are added to the online catalog record. The study helps to establish the positive role of tables of contents in online catalogs. The research establishes TOC as a major parameter that can be successfully studied using quantitative methods. The study also provides information professionals with some guidance on when enhancement of TOC is likely to be most effective in increasing the use of existing collections.  相似文献   

18.
《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):9-18
Abstract

Both photocopied tables of contents and originals were scanned by optical character recognition (OCR). (The threshold for acceptable OCR conversion is a break-even point of 94% accuracy; it is cheaper to rekey data than fix corrupted data if rates fall below this point.) The results suggest that OCR recognition rates are likely to support improved capture productivity for as many as 75% of tables of contents. More than half (55%) of the sample can be processed effectively.  相似文献   

19.
Using late medieval examples from Switzerland, this paper argues that the emergence of formally organized archives around 1500 was part of an important shift in how documents could be deployed. However, this shift was not away from an oral and toward a literate culture, as argued in some earlier studies, but rather away from seeing documents as testimony that reminded a community about past authoritative actors, and toward relating the texts of documents to other texts, that is, to contexts. This shift took place largely through the appropriation of methods for using and organizing written material that had been developed in the realms of scholastic theology and liturgy, and applying them to secular lordship and administration. These methods provided new models for organizing collections of parchments and papers into connected archives and gave rise to new forms of text collection such as reorganized versions of law books (Spiegel, Coutumiers) containing new search tools such as tables of contents (capitulationes) and indices (abecedaria). Individual charters and scattered legal norms were also organized into textusglossae structures in larger and smaller administrative units. In the Swiss case, the contextualization of legal texts was accompanied by an increased attribution of authority to ‘custom’ in general, because the community-oriented attribution of meaning found in earlier use was lost. Ultimately, recasting individual documents as part of larger textual contexts increased the power of rulers and ushered in an age of lawyers and of archives.  相似文献   

20.
中外科技期刊英文目次编排形式的调查及分析   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
调查了国内外49种自然科学版学术期刊,其英文目次的编排格式多达22种,主要表现在英文题名大小写、字体和作者姓名编排格式的差异.特别是国内科技期刊英文目次编排形式较多,占了17种,国外期刊英文目次编排形式有5种.在分析了国内外科技期刊英文目次编排形式的基础上,推荐了美国现代语言协会(MLA)关于科技期刊英文目次的编排规范.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号