共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
通过问卷调查了解我国科研人员对学术信息资源开放获取的参与现状及影响因素等,在此基础上,主要从科研人员整体及有参与经历的科研人员两个角度,根据影响较大的因素分析科研人员参与开放获取的主要推动力,包括:保证科研人员对OA有足够的认知程度,建设具权威性和影响力的OA资源,保持OA出版模式的优势,避免知识产权纠纷,将OA资源纳入学术评价体系,对OA期刊投稿提供经费支持。 相似文献
2.
3.
开放存取期刊论文质量和影响力的评价研究 总被引：9，自引：0，他引：9
随机抽取2004年生物学领域影响因子相近的完全OA期刊与非OA期刊各5种,排除评论性和综述性的文章,从论文的影响力、论丈间质量的差异性,作者合作度三个方面,采用平均被引频次.被引频次的极差、平均作者数,论文合著率4个指标进行统计分析,进而研究开放存取模式下论文的学术水平和影响力.研究结果显示,OAJ论文已经达到甚至超过非OAJ论文的质量和影响力. 相似文献
4.
5.
本文通过对SCIE收录的国际眼科学期刊开放获取（OA）情况和程度的研究发现：完全OA期刊随时间延长被引频次逐渐增长。完全OA、部分OA、非OA期刊文献计量学指标差异不大。与非OA论文相比,OA论文数量、百分比、总被引频次、年均被引频次稍高。OA期刊优势主要体现在被引频次的增长上,OA程度和资源利用度尚低。建议有关部门加大经费支持力度,期刊加强网站建设,提升自身影响力。 相似文献
6.
7.
开放存取（OA：Open Access）足一种“发表付费、阅读免费”的全新出版模式。作者将自己的原始学术论文通过互联网直接刊载，而不是通过传统的纸本出版模式发表，刊登的文章大多数内容均经过同行评议（peerreviewed）．以有效保证质量。以下均为开放存取（OA）资源。 相似文献
8.
在开放存取(OA)的期刊出版时代,学术期刊的出版、发行和运营会遇到哪些问题,近些年国外学术期刊的积极探索和实践已初步给出了一些提示。首先,学术期刊面临经费问题,尽管期刊可以有多种经费来源,但审稿和制作费用、邮寄费用、在线提交和审稿系统的费用等均需覆盖,采取何种OA模式以及何种运营策略,对打造高品质的学术期刊至关重要。其次,传统期刊的门槛和影响力也将受到一定冲击从而发生改变,把握OA出版模式对现有期刊、学术传播和科研等方面可能的冲击和影响,以及给新生期刊带来的机遇和空间,对打造有影响力的学术期刊非常关键。 相似文献
9.
开放获取运动给科技期刊的出版模式带来变革.面对前所未有的机遇和危机,国际上的科技期刊积极回应:新兴出版商大量新办开放获取期刊;传统出版商开设OA子刊,化"危"为"机";多数期刊打造混合出版模式,实现转型过渡发展.与此同时,我国科技期刊受到严峻的挑战:科技期刊开放获取发展不成熟,加速科研论文与经费外流;没有遵循国际OA标准,无法实行OA经营;政策制度不成熟,配套设施不匹配.在此背景下,本文提出开放获取环境下我国科技期刊的发展对策:遵循国际OA出版规范,创立中国特色的期刊OA模式;发展国内英文版期刊,实行国内外APC同质同价;建立集中开放获取平台,推进期刊集约化发展;确认预印本首发权,无缝对接科技期刊的优先出版;强化OA出版质量监控,培育市场化出版生态. 相似文献
10.
"开放获取"在国内的应用策略初探 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
实现开放获取（简称OA）的途径有：OA仓储和OA期刊。OA期刊区别于OA仓储的显著特点在于实行严格的同行评审制度。国内在OA的运行模式中涉及到运行资金、政策支持、影响力等问题。针对国内现状，作者认为可以由政府部门主导建立由大学、研究机构等创建和维护机构OA仓储，供所有用户免费使用；由政府主管部分投入资金创办一定数量的高质量OA期刊，用政府公共资金来保证OA期刊的创办、运行与维护。鉴于OA期刊的认可度在国内还没有形成共识，需要政府相关部门、研究机构、大学等制定相关政策，鼓励科研论文的开放存放和自由获取，提高OA期刊的影响力。 相似文献
11.
Bo‐Christer Bjrk 《Learned Publishing》2019,32(3):227-236
The number of open access (OA) journals and their share of all scholarly journals are usually estimated based on indexing in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). DOAJ's coverage of OA journals from different regions of the world is, however, far from complete, particularly of journals publishing in languages other than English. Using alternative data sources for identification and manual verification, 437 scholarly OA journals published in the five Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden) were identified, and some key characteristics were studied. Of these, only 184 were indexed in DOAJ. A vast majority of the journals was published by scholarly societies or universities. Social sciences and humanities dominated as topics, and few journals charge authors. National or university‐specific OJS portals have played a major role in enabling OA publishing. Around a third of the Nordic scholarly journals are currently OA. 相似文献
12.
13.
一种全新的学术出版模式:开放存取出版模式探析 总被引：118，自引：0，他引：118
开放存取是一种学术信息共享的自由理念和出版机制。其产生背景主要是:基于订阅 的学术期刊传统出版模式带来了严重的学术交流障碍;网络的运用使学术期刊出版和传播成本 大大降低。近年来相关的机构和项目已出现并初步取得成效。参考文献12。 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
This article reports on scholarly communication and open access (OA) in Korea. Drawing on a range of databases, articles, and reference sources, it provides unique insights. In contrast to the UK/US model of scholarly communication, in Korea, most scholarly journals are published by discipline‐based scholarly societies and research institutes affiliated to universities. Payment for publication is the norm, and typically features article processing charges and scholarly society membership fees for both OA and toll access (TA) journals. Online access to journals in Korea is provided by commercial vendors who enter into contracts with the scholarly societies for exclusive use. Three online access models apply – TA, gold OA, and dual access – with the use of these models varying between disciplines. In parallel with this access provided by commercial vendors, there are a number of government‐funded open access repositories (OARs) to which university researchers are requested to deposit their research outputs, as well as OARs run by universities and other research institutes. 相似文献
17.
John Hartley Jason Potts Lucy Montgomery Ellie Rennie Cameron Neylon 《Learned Publishing》2019,32(1):27-35
Much of the argument around reforming, remaking, or preserving the traditions of scholarly publishing is built on economic principles, explicit or implicit. Can we afford open access (OA)? How do we pay for high‐quality services? Why does it cost so much? In this article, we argue that the sterility of much of this debate is a result of failure to tackle the question of what a journal is in economic terms. We offer a way through by demonstrating that a journal is a club and discuss the implications for the scholarly publishing industry. We use examples, ranging from OA to prestige journals, to explain why congestion is a problem for club‐based publications, and to discuss the importance of creative destruction for the maintenance of knowledge‐generating communities in publishing. 相似文献
18.
This study examines aspects of scholarly journal publishing in the Nordic countries. On average half of Nordic journals publish online. In most Nordic countries, commercial publishers predominate; however, in Finland the majority are society publishers. The number of open access journals is low, in line with international figures. There is concern to maintain local languages in journal publishing. A majority of the journals publishing in local languages are within social science, humanities, and arts; the STM sector publishes in English. English‐language publications are favoured in research assessments, international recognition, and impact, while the visibility of local‐language scholarly journals in international databases is low. The Nordbib program supports Nordic scholarly journals and fosters co‐operation with publishing companies and learned societies over migration to e‐publishing; it also supports open access. The article discusses future challenges for journal publishing, pointing out the problems of small journal publishers and the need for co‐operation between stakeholders. 相似文献
19.
Bryna Coonin 《Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship》2013,18(3):193-212
Open access (OA) publishing is now accepted as an integral part of the emerging trends within scholarly communication. Business librarians, like their subject specialist colleagues in other disciplines, are increasingly called upon to interpret scholarly communication trends to their faculty. This study surveys 1,293 business faculty from American schools of business accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. Issues explored include business faculty publishing practices within the discipline and how these affect academic advancement, obtaining articles for their own research, electronic publishing, self-archiving, and their perceptions about OA publishing generally. 相似文献
20.
开放存取期刊出版的发展现状及其影响分析 总被引：36，自引：2，他引：36
通过调研分析，指出开放存取(OA)期刊目前呈现出良好的发展态势，其规模与影响力不断扩大，有多种出版形式。同时，深入分析OA期刊出版对当前学术交流系统中的各利益关系方（包括科研人员、传统出版机构、图书馆和科研资助机构）所产生的积极影响。 相似文献