共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
联合、开放、网络化-《图书馆合作与信息资源共享武汉宣言》解读 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：4
解读了《图书馆合作与信息资源共享武汉宣言》在三个方面的呼吁:关注信息技术对知识整理和知识交流的影响,开展相关的活动;注重与其他知识传播主体的合作,有效地利用行业分工;密切注意法律框架的变化,争取更有利的制度安排。 相似文献
2.
[目的/意义] 开放获取模式有多种途径,其中"钻石开放获取(DOA)"是一种新兴模式,在保持科学共同体学术独立性方面逐渐受到非营利出版商的重视。[方法/过程] 采用文献调查法、网络调查法以及内容分析法,解读DOA模式的特点、追踪其实践探索,调研DOA平台的发展情况,分析DOA学术交流生态系统的核心要素。[结果/结论] 挖掘DOA模式的潜在问题,包括资金的可持续性不足、多语言科研成果的国际传播障碍、数字存档的永久保存不足等;聚焦解决措施包括经费补充机制、鼓励多语种的科学知识流通、加强DOA资源的永久保存等。提出构建我国开放获取能力中心以及为非营利出版商提供开放获取的新路径,为我国开放获取的理论与实践提供启示。 相似文献
3.
This paper examines changing research practices in the digital environment. A review of the literature and our own field research in Australia suggest that there is a new mode of knowledge production emerging, changing research practices and bringing new information access and dissemination needs. Adjustments will be required to accommodate these changes, but new opportunities are emerging for more cost‐effective and sustainable information access and dissemination. It will be necessary, however, to take an holistic approach and treat the creation, production and distribution of scholarly information, the management of information rights and access, systems of review and evaluation and the underlying infrastructure as parts of a single research information and scholarly communication system. 相似文献
4.
5.
论述了纸媒传播时代科技期刊的7项功能——传播扩散、公布保护展示、保存传承、把关控制、筛选集萃、加工提升、评价裁判;这7项功能中根据属性的不同,有的属于期刊的基本功能,有的属于衍生功能。在分析当前网络学术资源传播开放集成共享的现状的基础上,论述了新环境中科技期刊功能转位趋向,即原来的基本功能将被弱化甚至替代,衍生功能势必上升为主要功能。期刊人只有对此有所认识,才能适应变化,应对挑战。 相似文献
6.
Kate Gyllensvard 《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(4):324-326
Academic journals have traditionally provided disciplinary forums for scholarly communication (i.e., vetting, legitimating, and disseminating new ideas). Digitization is affecting scholarly communication and academic journals. Two effects are the bundling of journals by publishers and the growing variety of formats that open up new avenues of dissemination. Both effects have disrupted the traditional roles and relationships of scholars and their institutions, publishers and libraries in the processes of scholarly communication, including the significance of academic journals as a format. 相似文献
7.
Dr. Katherine Skinner is the Executive Director of the Educopia Institute. Founded in 2006, the Educopia Institute is a nonprofit educational organization that hosts inter-institutional, collaborative programs for the production, dissemination, and preservation of digital scholarship. She is the founding program director for the MetaArchive Cooperative that launched in 2004. That community-owned and community-governed digital preservation network now has more than 50 member institutions in four countries. Dr. Skinner also directs the Library Publishing Coalition project, a two-year initiative to create a new organization to support library publishing and scholarly communications activities in conjunction with more than 50 academic libraries. 相似文献
8.
一种全新的学术出版模式:开放存取出版模式探析 总被引：118，自引：0，他引：118
开放存取是一种学术信息共享的自由理念和出版机制。其产生背景主要是:基于订阅 的学术期刊传统出版模式带来了严重的学术交流障碍;网络的运用使学术期刊出版和传播成本 大大降低。近年来相关的机构和项目已出现并初步取得成效。参考文献12。 相似文献
9.
E. M. Campos 《International Information and Library Review》2013,45(2):143-146
AbstractA practicing profession’s bond to the university accentuates the profession’s mode of knowledge creation and dissemination. Social work journals are seen to facilitate the growth and development of scientifically based knowledge in the profession. The literature reports that in the social work profession social work practitioners do not read a great deal of research articles in journals, do not contribute many articles to scholarly journals, do not write many articles based on empirical research, and are not influenced by social work theory. Grey documentation is presented as an additional source of knowledge for the social work practitioner. Its characteristics, subject areas, mode of presentation and sources are seen as making it conducive for use by social work practitioners. A proposal for the dissemination of grey documentation in social work is made. 相似文献
10.
通过比较国外学术信息的“开放存取”运动和“公众存取科学文献”政策的异同及对相关实践经验进行分析，强调“公众存取”政策对于改善学术信息传播具有重要意义。针对国内外学术信息传播领域的现状，探讨我国实行公众存取政策的必要性和可行性，进而提出在制定政策的过程中应注意的一些问题。 相似文献
11.
In the shift of scholarly publishing from the print environment to online, the preservation of the scholarly record has become more complex, difficult, and uncertain. Current efforts are not adequate. Core criteria and certification processes have been developed for digital preservation repositories. Broad library support is crucial to the sustainability of third-party preservation archives. Publisher participation in third-party archives has grown, but coverage is incomplete and uneven, leaving some categories of materials well-covered and others vulnerable. Preservation programs need to coordinate their efforts and view themselves as collaborators rather than competitors. The task of preserving the digital scholarly record cannot fall to libraries alone—it requires a social compact among all involved parties. 相似文献
12.
《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(4):157-173
ABSTRACT Since 1976 The Serials Librarian has provided librarians and others associated with the production and dissemination of serials with scholarly investigations exploring numerous aspects of managing the complex nature of serials as a form of communication. This essay examines the nature of all articles published between 1976 and 2004 and categorizes them by topic, gender, and author affiliation. 相似文献
13.
Xiang REN 《Learned Publishing》2013,26(3):197-205
A growing number of online journals and academic platforms are adopting light peer review or ‘publish then filter’ models of scholarly communication. These approaches have the advantage of enabling instant exchanges of knowledge between academics and are part of a wider search for alternatives to traditional peer review and certification processes in scholarly publishing. However, establishing credibility and identifying the correct balance between communication and scholarly rigour remains an important challenge for digital communication platforms targeting academic communities. This paper looks at a highly influential, government‐backed, open publishing platform in China: Science Paper Online, which is using transparent post‐publication peer‐review processes to encourage innovation and address systemic problems in China's traditional academic publishing system. There can be little doubt that the Chinese academic publishing landscape differs in important ways from counterparts in the United States and Western Europe. However, this article suggests that developments in China also provide important lessons about the potential of digital technology and government policy to facilitate a large‐scale shift towards more open and networked models of scholarly communication. 相似文献
14.
Jean-Pierre V. M. Hérubel 《Learned Publishing》2023,36(2):164-170
Academic book and journal publishing constitutes the majority focus of university presses. Besides commercial scholarly publishers, academic scholars and researchers view the opportunities provided by university presses as important venues for the dissemination of their research. This discussion focuses on the disciplinary imperative to publish scholarship that is ever more fluid and specialized as academic disciplines continue to become further nuanced in their response to the increasing knowledge produced by humanities and social science inquiry. The focus is on university presses and not commercial scholarly presses, although constitute a significant locus of scholarly publishing. What are the general characteristics of academic specialization and university press publishing? Further, how is disciplinary fluidity, especially evolving specialization, reflected in university press book publishing nomenclature and how scholarship is tied to the intellectual preoccupations of academic specialization? Multi- and inter-disciplinarities further articulate disciplinary publishing, accelerating disciplinary fluidity. Examples from disciplinary and emerging configurations of disciplinary nomenclature utilized by university presses offers insight into specialization and publishing. Academic history publishing is used to illustrate newly emerging fluid disciplinary configurations. 相似文献
15.
It is well known that a number of research outcomes are not reported (the so‐called ‘file drawer problem’). It is generally assumed that what is not reported are ‘negative results’. Our study approaches the issue from a new angle by exploring what researchers perceive to be ‘unpublishable’. A survey regarding ‘unpublishables’ was sent out to 2,535 faculty members at Indiana University. Forty of these individuals consented to in‐depth interviews, which more fully explored these academics' views on the issue of unpublishable work. Our results indicate that there are several types of research besides negative results that are perceived to be unpublishable yet worthy of publication. Moreover, there is a great diversity within and across disciplines as to what constitutes ‘unpublishable’ research. Respondents indicated that academic discourse would benefit from the formal dissemination of papers that included inconclusive or null results, as well as replication and refutation studies. The results of our study suggest that there is a perceived gap in scholarly communication, which is to the detriment of science. These results can be used by administrators, educators, and publishers in order to refine scholarly communication practices so as to create a more robust, accurate literature and to inform future generations of researchers. 相似文献
16.
17.
开放获取环境下的图书馆 总被引：45，自引：0，他引：45
介绍了开放获取的定义、类型和优势,归纳分析了开放获取对图书馆采访、期刊服务带来的影响,以及使图书馆角色可能发生的一些变化,并探讨了图书馆为了支持这种新兴的学术交流模式而参与开放获取的各种做法。 相似文献
18.
19.
以美国洛斯阿拉莫斯国家实验室(LANL)研究图书馆、加拿大科技信息研究所(CISTI)、德国马普学会数字图书馆(MPDL)三家图书馆为例,分析国外文献信息服务机构的知识服务实践,总结知识化、网络化时代知识服务的模式与机制,主要包括图书馆服务模式转型优化、机构知识资产管理、科研数据管理与服务、构建虚拟研究环境、改进学术信息交流模式和环境5个方面。 相似文献
20.
Eti Herman John Akeroyd Gaelle Bequet David Nicholas Anthony Watkinson 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(3):213-229
This article presents an up‐to‐date portrayal of the greatly changed landscape of scholarly journal publishing and identifies the emerging trends characterizing it. We consider the attributes, novelty, and disruptive potential of different models, which range from improvements to the extant model to attempts at reconfiguration and transformation. We propose that journal transition can be seen as falling into three categories. The first is enhanced models of the traditional scholarly journal, which typically afford enriched functionality that breaks the bonds of the printed page whilst otherwise remaining wholly traditional in their offerings. The second category is innovative models of the traditional scholarly journal, which aim at supporting the journal in performing its traditional roles through convention‐altering ways. The third category is the possible alternatives to the traditional journal, which represent a move towards alternative modes of knowledge dissemination. This review shows that each of the models identified makes contributions to enriching the reporting and showcasing of scholarly output. They also make it more effective and more efficient. However, we conclude that none of the possible alternatives being discussed can serve as a full‐fledged alternative to the journal. 相似文献