共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
不同文种"一稿两投"的国际规范及我国应采取的编辑政策 总被引：8，自引：0，他引：8
就生物医学论文以不同的文种、在不同的国家再次发表的行业国际规范进行调研,认定同一论文以不同的文种在国内外生物医学期刊上相继发表不属于国际生物医学期刊界违反版权法和科学道德的一稿多投行为.提出为了既有利于扩大我国高水平的生物医学科研成果在国际上的影响,又能使这些成果在国内学术期刊上有所反映,满足国内广大读者的需要, 可以将在国际生物医学期刊上发表的英文论文以中文全文再次发表在国内生物医学期刊上, 或以"述评""摘要"等多种形式在国内生物医学期刊上予以介绍.然而中文全文的再次发表必须是有选择的、有比例的,同时必须满足国际规范的各项规定和要求. 相似文献
2.
Bryan R. Coles 《Learned Publishing》1994,7(2):89-91
Scientists are users of science journals in two senses—to enter their own work and to learn of others—but are rarely the direct purchaser of them. The health of research is inextricably bound up with the learned journal. Muck is contributed by scientists to their journals in invisible ways, such as refereeing and editing. The creation of an archive of information is the primary service the journal supplies. Libraries pay for its entry into the system; research organizations and university faculties must recognize that this cost has to be met. The views expressed here are those of a publisher as well as of a user. 相似文献
3.
Mohammad Salehi Mohammad Soltani Hadis Tamleh Shohreh Teimournezhad 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(2):89-95
The proliferation of predatory or bogus journals has been recognized as a threat to academic research, and this study was conducted to discover the experiences of authors published in these journals. Eighty authors who had published in journals identified as predatory were surveyed. We asked how the authors learnt about these journals, what they thought about the reputation of the journals, their experiences of peer review and the quality of feedback provided, and whether publication was driven by PhD or job requirements. Our results showed that a third of authors discovered the journals by web searches or responding to email invitations. Over half said the reputation and name of the journal were important in selecting a journal, although a third admitted that the journal they published in did not have a good reputation. The main reason for selecting the journals was the promise of fast publication (31.2% respondents). Only half of the respondents said that publication was driven by PhD or job requirements. Just over a third reported that peer review was good or excellent, and only 17.5% said that peer review was poor or non‐existent – over 70% thought they had received good feedback from the journals. Although the research was somewhat limited, it does indicate general satisfaction with the journals in which the authors published. Fast publication coupled with good feedback and encouragement to submit can make publishing in predatory journals so tempting that few authors can resist. 相似文献
4.
5.
Ann Barrett Melissa Helwig Karen Neves 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2016,104(2):118-124
Objectives
This study describes the literature of hospital pharmacy and identifies the journals most commonly cited by authors in the field, the publication types most frequently cited, the age of citations, and the indexing access to core journals. The study also looks at differing citation practices between journals with a wide audience compared to a national journal with a focus on regional issues and trends in the field.Method
Cited references from five discipline-specific source journals were collected and analyzed for publication type and age. Two sets were created for comparison. Bradford''s Law of Scattering was applied to both sets to determine the most frequently cited journals.Results
Three-quarters of all cited items were published within the last 10 years (71%), and journal articles were the most heavily cited publication type (n=65,760, 87%). Citation analysis revealed 26 journal titles in Zone 1, 177 journal titles in Zone 2, and the remaining were scattered across 3,886 titles. Analysis of a national journal revealed Zone 1 comprised 9 titles. Comparison of the 2 sets revealed that Zone 1 titles overlapped, with the exception of 2 titles that were geographically focused in the national title.Conclusion
Hospital pharmacy literature draws heavily from its own discipline-specific sources but equally from core general and specialty medical journals. Indexing of cited journals is complete in PubMed and EMBASE but lacking in International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. Gray literature is a significant information source in the field. 相似文献6.
7.
开放文档先导及其对学术期刊数字化传播方式的影响 总被引：17，自引：2，他引：15
信息技术的进步以及作者和读者的需求,推动着学术期刊数字化传播方式的发展.开放文档先导(OAI)是一个旨在促进网络信息资源传播的合作组织.开放文献元数据采集协议 (OAMHP) 通过元数据采集这种模式实现网上发布信息的不同组织之间的互操作.一些研究者和机构正试图通过建立"自归档"的开放访问文档来克服科学出版的费用壁垒.应当充分利用OAI提供的信息传播和交换能力来促进学术期刊的数字化传播. 相似文献
8.
One of the most important issues facing scholarly communication today is what constitutes quality in the publishing and dissemination of research findings; the aim of this exploratory research study was to investigate author‐perceived quality characteristics of science, technology and medicine journals. We triangulated data from a small number of volunteer full‐time faculty members of Long Island University, using three different research techniques: (1) questionnaire survey, (2) focus groups, and (3) semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews. The study identified some significant differences by discipline, gender, and tenure status. Overall, the three most important attributes were the reputation of the journal, the estimated length of time to article publication, and the readership of the journal. Our findings bring new insight into this area for the scholarly research community as a whole. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
"5W"传播模式下科技期刊传播的"变"与"应变"——基于媒体融合背景 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
拉斯维尔"5W"传播模式为研究信息传播提供强大指引.互联网和大数据的不断发展以及信息化手段的不断提升,促进各类媒体的深度融合,"5W"模式的核心内涵也随之发生深刻变化.这一变化为科技期刊的信息传播带来前所未有的机遇和挑战.只有深入、全面、系统地认识媒体融合的特点、本质和内涵,综合利用传统媒体与各种新型媒体的优势,在学术信息传播五大要素方面深刻领悟媒体融合趋势对信息传播的巨大影响,科技期刊的转型升级和创新发展才能实现根本性的突破. 相似文献
12.
从学科覆盖、作者队伍、读者群、期刊统计数据以及学术环境5个方面分析高校学报的优势.通过高校学报与专业期刊的总被引频次、影响因子指标的对比发现,专业期刊并不具特别的优势,高校学报的影响力正在稳步提升.高校学报通过正确定位、重塑编委团队、以内容为王、融入创新、改革管理策略、建立健全编辑队伍激励机制等途径,提升高校学报的学术水平,走依靠高校学科特色、服务高校学科与科研、服务广大师生、发现并培养人才的正确办刊之路. 相似文献
13.
14.
1989～1998年我国期刊工作现代化研究成果的统计分析 总被引：9，自引：4，他引：5
以华北煤炭医学院图书馆编辑出版的《1989～1998期刊工作文摘》为样本,统计分析近10年我国期刊工作现代化学术研究的进展。 相似文献
15.
实行优先数字出版对于作者、读者、期刊出版方及国家科研发展都具有重要意义.我国实行优先数字出版的期刊越来越多,但与此同时出现了诸多乱象.对优先数字出版的认识不足、期刊出版方的管理制度不严、数据库的监管不严及行业标准的缺失是造成乱象的根源.期刊出版方在规范优先数字出版方面需要明确4 个要素: 概念、DOI 认证、版本的设置和优先出版文献的规范引用.此外,期刊出版方、数据库方和管理方应充分发挥自身力量推动优先数字出版有序、健康发展. 相似文献
16.
17.
在多模式集中办刊和融媒发展的背景下,资源环境科技期刊集群的出版功能和知识服务体系构建正处于积极拓展的阶段.本文从出版、运营、服务和宣传等角度提出了刊群体系融合和内部优化建设的6项策略:单刊和刊群有效结合,实现资源集成化、共享化发展;优化刊群结构,明确英文刊、特色刊和精品中文刊发展定位;创建资源环境领域科学数据与期刊论文关联出版实践平台;运用新媒体技术增强富媒体出版和集群平台增值服务能力;深入探索期刊集群由学术传播向深层次、个性化知识服务衍生的模式和途径;依托学科特色鲜明的系列学术会议提升LoRES平台的传播功能,并提出了刊群向外拓展建设的方向和可能性,以推动跨媒介的学术出版平台和学术交流平台转型升级为中国特色新型智库建设的重要支撑力量. 相似文献
18.
19.
随着国民教育水平的不断提升和专业化分工的不断深入,社会大众对来自学术媒体的专业化信息的需求也在逐渐升温.为适应当下大众阅读习惯和阅读方式,传统“静态-单向”的“残缺”的学术期刊出版模式在新媒体技术和思维的推动下,逐渐向“动态-双向”的“完整”的学术期刊出版模式转变.这种转变既还原了学术期刊作为学术媒体应有的媒体意义,也拓展了学术期刊影响力的提升路径.本文在揭示新媒体时代信息传播特点的基础上,分析新媒体环境对传统学术期刊出版带来的机遇和挑战,并重点从学术期刊生产、传播、信息反馈3个环节探究新媒体技术和思维引入后的学术期刊影响力提升机制,以期为新媒体时代的学术期刊影响力提升实践提供理论支撑. 相似文献
20.
本文以高校实际使用的学术成果分级目录为视角,探讨中文图书情报类期刊的分层结构,为图情研究人员确定成果发表渠道、图书馆员调整期刊订购方案、高校管理人员制定学术成果分级决策提供参考;通过网络调研,汇总整理了国内63所有图书情报类硕士点(含专硕)高校发布的学术成果分级目录,提取了24种图书情报类期刊,统一编码、整理,对数据聚类产生期刊分层结果;发现图书情报类期刊的层次区分比较明显,处于上层的期刊多年来一直保持相对稳定,高校学术成果分级目录明显受CSSCI来源期刊遴选和北大核心期刊评选结果影响,表明核心期刊与非核心期刊的"桶"分类系统对高校学术成果分级政策起到了明显的导向作用。 相似文献