共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 216 毫秒
1.
为提升预防医学与公共卫生学综合类中国科技核心期刊学术质量和学术影响力,通过2013—2019年出版的《中国科技期刊引证报告（核心版）》收集总被引频次、影响因子、即年指标、他引率、AR论文量、平均引文数、平均作者数、基金论文比等资料,采用线性混合模型分析2012—2018年各个指标年份间差异及变化趋势,并对总被引频次和影响因子进行排序。结果显示,2012—2018年,预防医学与公共卫生学综合类中国科技核心期刊由16种增加至22种,均为中文期刊,连续收录16种。影响因子、即年指标、AR论文量、平均引文数和平均作者数2012—2018年均呈上升趋势（P < 0.05）,总被引频次、他引率和基金论文比无明显变化趋势（P>0.05）;预防医学与公共卫生学综合类中国科技核心期刊学术质量和学术影响力不断提升。 相似文献
2.
Zahiruddin Khurshid 《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(1):81-98
This research study evaluates the quality of articles published by Saudi and expatriate authors in foreign Library and Information Science (LIS) journals using three popular metrics for ranking journals—Journal Impact Factor (JIF), SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), and Google Scholar Metrics (GSM). The reason for using multiple metrics is to see how closely or differently journals are ranked by the three different methods of citation analysis. However, the 2012 JIF list of journals is too small, almost half the size of the SJR and GSM lists, which inhibited one-to-one comparison among the impact factors of the thirty-six journals selected by Saudi authors for publishing articles. Only seventeen journals were found common to all the three lists, limiting the usefulness of the data. A basic problem is that Saudi LIS authors generally lack the level of competency in the English language required to achieve publication in the most prominent LIS journals. The study will have implications for authors, directors, and deans of all types of academic libraries; chairmen and deans of library schools; and the Saudi Library Association. Hopefully these entities will take necessary steps to prepare and motivate both academics and practicing librarians to improve the quality of their research and publications and thus get published in higher ranked journals. 相似文献
3.
基于2003-2007年Thomson Reuters和中国科学技术信息研究所历年发布的Journal Citation Reports(JCR)及<中国科技期刊引证报告>(CJCR),比较分析中外科技期刊载文数、总被引频次、影响因子、即年指标、被引半衰期等各项文献计量指标的变化趋势.结果显示,国内外科技期刊的平均载文量和总体学术影响力近年来一直在稳步上升,并且我国科技期刊近年来的发展速度要高于世界总体水平. 相似文献
4.
2008-2013年中外科技期刊载文与引证指标分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
基于2008-2013年Thomson Reuters发布的Journal Citation Reports (JCR)及中国科学技术信息研究所发布的《中国科技期刊引证报告》(CJCR),比较分析中外科技期刊载文量、总被引频次、影响因子、即年指标等各主要文献计量指标的变化.结果显示,我国被SCI收录期刊的数量和影响力指标近年来总体上呈上升态势,但年平均载文量却稍有下降,以中文期刊为主的CJCR收录期刊数量和年平均载文量均呈停滞增长甚至下降的趋势.这可能表明我国科技期刊的稿源竞争力有所下降. 相似文献
5.
Li Sun 《Learned Publishing》2019,32(3):207-211
Researchers applauded Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)’s new selection criteria that removed many existing journals from its index because they are ‘Not Adhering to Best Practice’. However, many of these journals have acceptable scholarly quality. The present study compares such removed journals to a trustworthy bibliometric database, SCImago Journal & Country Rank (the Scopus Database). It finds many overlaps. Some of the overlapping journals have a high score in the SCImago ranks. This paper calls for a more transparent process of journal reviews by DOAJ or even a re‐examination of the selection criteria and/or the evaluation process. 相似文献
6.
在当今我国建设世界一流科技期刊的大环境下,一些高校学报积极行动,抓住机遇、准确定位、努力提升办刊质量。《华南农业大学学报》(以下简称《学报》)以内容为王、立足学校的优势学科为抓手,以服务学校的学科建设和人才培养为目的,近年来在专题(栏)策划方面积极探索,成功地出版了多个专题,提升了《学报》的办刊质量。本文总结了《学报》近年来专题(栏)策划出版的成功案例。结果表明:专题出版集中展示了某一学科的科研成果,促进了学科建设和人才培养;高质量专题拓展了《学报》优质稿源,有助于解决期刊优质稿源缺乏的问题和困境,提升了办刊质量。专题的出版不仅提高了期刊学术影响力,也吸引了读者和作者的关注,提升了后续的来稿质量,是提高办刊质量的有效途径。 相似文献
7.
Digital object identifier and its use in core Chinese academic journals: A Chinese perspective 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Digital object identifiers (DOIs) are widely used across the world but not very much within China. This paper investigates the current usage of DOIs in China. Using an isometric method, we sampled 238 core Chinese academic journals from the Chinese Science and Technical Journal Citation Reports (2015 version, Core Edition), which includes 2,383 journals in total. According to our investigation, we found that: (1) although 80.25% of journals assign DOIs, 42.41% have only assigned DOIs to articles published after 2010; (2) most journals (89.01%) register DOIs through Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China; and (3) only 84.82% of journals that register DOIs include them in the articles. This paper looks at the reasons for the limited implementation of DOIs and makes suggestions as to how usage can be expanded in China. 相似文献
8.
Omwoyo Bosire Onyancha 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2017,33(1):71-91
The purpose of the study was to investigate and compare the social media (SM) impact of 273 South Africa Post-Secondary Education accredited journals, which are recognised by the Department of Higher Education and Training of South Africa for purposes of financial support. We used multiple sources to extract data for the study, namely, Altmetric.com, Google Scholar (GS), Scopus (through SCImago) and the Thomson Reuters (TR) Journal Citation Reports (JCR). Data was analysed to determine South African journals’ presence in and impact on SM as well as to contrast SM visibility and impact with the citation impact in GS, JCR and Scopus. The Spearman correlation test was performed to compare the impact of the journals on SM and other sources. The results reveal that 2923 articles published in 122 of the 273 South African (SA) journals have received at least one mention in SM; the most commonly used SM platforms were Twitter and Facebook; the journals indexed in the TR’s citation indexes and Scopus performed much better, in terms of their average altmetrics, than non-TR and non-Scopus indexed journals; and there were weak to moderate relationships among different types of altmetrics and citation-based measures, thereby implying different kinds of journal impacts on SM when compared to the scholarly impact reflected in citation databases. In conclusion, South African journals’ impact on SM, just as is the case with countries with similar economies, is minimal but has shown signs of growth. 相似文献
9.
以被引频次、H指数、相对H指数为评价指标,对国内10种图书馆学核心期刊,重点对H指数最高的《中国图书馆学报》和《大学图书馆学报》的论文作者进行评价。结果发现《中国图书馆学报》、《大学图书馆学报》的H指数、相对H指数、被引频次和最高被引频次均在我国图书馆学期刊中名列前茅,拥有高素质作者群,所载论文综合质量高,说明这两种期刊及相关作者具有较高的学术影响力。 相似文献
10.
11.
中国高校学报“垃圾论”辨析——基于农业高校与非高校学术期刊影响力的比较 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
通过分析我国农业高校学报与研究院所、学会主办学术期刊之间的差别,论证高校学报并非垃圾产品。将农业类学术期刊分为省属高校类、省级学会类和国家级学会类3种不同类型,综合分析比较3种不同类型农业类期刊在影响因子、基金论文比等5项指标上的差异。统计结果表明:国家级学会学术期刊总被引频次、影响因子、他引影响因子、基金论文比4个指标极显著地高于省级学会学术期刊(P<0.01);省属高校学报的影响因子、他引影响因子、基金论文也极显著地高于省级学会学术期刊(P<0.01),而且基金论文比、他引总引比略高于国家级学会学术期刊,差异不显著(P>0.05)。综合分析表明:国家级学会学术期刊的大部分指标高于省属高校学报,而省属高校学报均高于省级学会学术期刊,部分指标接近国家级学会学术期刊;近3年,农业类学术期刊总体上的各项评价指标正在逐年提高,农业高校学术期刊的综合影响力较高。 相似文献
12.
科技期刊的国际化是期刊发展的必然方向,也是提高期刊学术水平和扩大影响力的有效途径。国内英文医学期刊是国内外医学成果交流的重要媒介。关于如何向国际化发展,本文以《中华创伤杂志》（英文版）为例,介绍期刊近两年来的措施与经验,以期为国内医学英语期刊国际化发展提供借鉴。 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
16.
目的：评估中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）收录的7种儿科类期刊质量。方法：通过“中国科技期刊引证指标数据库”获得7种儿科类期刊2013年的篇均参考文献、被引半衰期、H 指数、引用半衰期、自引率、影响因子、即年指数、自被引率等数据,并将指标按其与期刊质量的正、负相关关系分为两组,分别绘制蛛网图,然后结合7种儿科类期刊的发文情况进行质量评估。结果：以篇均参考文献、影响因子、H 指数、即年指数为一组进行蛛网图法评估,排在前3位的期刊是《中华儿科杂志》《中华实用儿科临床杂志》、《中国循证儿科杂志》;以引用半衰期、自引率、被引半衰期、自被引率为一组进行蛛网图法评估,排在前3位的期刊是《中国循证儿科杂志》、《中华儿科杂志》、《临床儿科杂志》。结论：7种儿科类期刊整体质量较高,《中国循证儿科杂志》、《中华儿科杂志》综合评价最好,其他各刊还有提升空间。 相似文献
17.
中国科技期刊国际影响力提升计划已经实施4 年.本研究拟对首批资助期刊的实施效果——国际影响力的提升做一比较分析.将2017 年JCR 收录期刊列表中所有的中国出版的 SCI 期刊分为提升计划首批资助期刊与未获资助期刊2 组,收集 2 组期刊2013—2017 年间被引频次与影响因子数据,并进行比较分析.结果发现,在首批获资助的SCI 期刊与未获资助的SCI期刊中,部分期刊的被引频次与影响因子2 个指标不升反降,部分下降幅度超过10％; 首批资助期刊仅被引频次增长率高于未获资助期刊,其影响因子的增长率反而低于未获资助期刊,提示提升计划对资助期刊国际影响力的作用尚不明显.建议6 部委调整有关资助方向和经费使用指导方向与实施细则. 相似文献
18.
Wen‐Yau Cathy Lin 《Learned Publishing》2017,30(3):193-204
This research explores the performance of Asian S&T journals based on the outcomes of various citation indicators. Indexed by Journal Citation Reports – Science Citation Index Expanded (JCR‐SCIE), journals published in China, Japan, India, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan between the years 2008 and 2012 are collected and analysed using bibliometrics and statistics methods. Results showed that the mean impact factor (IF) value of the journals from all countries was less than 1.3 throughout the period. Only journals from China and Japan had a mean IF or 5‐year IF (5Y‐IF) value exceeding 1. The self‐cited rate of the journals from South Korea remained the highest among selected countries but showed a declining trend every year. The self‐cited rates among journals from all the six Asian countries did not considerably affect the journals’ IF values. The results revealed that the IF‐based ranking factor (IF‐RF) of Chinese and Japanese journals in various subject fields constantly improved from 2008 to 2012, but this improvement trend was not observed in journals from the other four countries. Overall, the journals from Japan and China demonstrated stronger impacts than those from the other countries. 相似文献
19.
针对科技期刊编委会成员产生方式主观性较强、编委作用发挥不充分等问题,提出一种基于文献计量学的期刊编委遴选方法.从专家学术影响力、学术活跃度和编委贡献度3个维度选取H指数、前3年年均发表文章数、本刊投稿数、审稿数等4个指标进行统计分析,以《中国舰船研究》编委会换届为例给出了计量结果.结果表明,该方法可遴选出学术影响力较高、符合期刊发展预期的编委,尤其是遴选出处于学术研究上升期的中青年编委. 相似文献
20.
本文基于Altmetrics指标、《乌利希国际期刊指南》和期刊引证报告(JCR)等数据,对中国英文科技期刊社会影响力进行统计分析.截至2020年5月,中国正式出版(取得CN号)英文科技期刊371种,约占中国科技期刊总数的7.5％.本文对当前主流Altmetrics工具进行了分析,并对中国英文科技期刊的社会影响力指标进行了统计.结果显示:有63.6％的期刊被Altmetrics的统计源提及,被提及文章数少于100篇的期刊占到58.1％.中国英文科技期刊的社会影响力相对较高的主要集中于生物医学领域,近10年新创办期刊社会影响力表现突出.本文对提高科技期刊社会影响力的途径进行了归纳,包括同国际出版商的多样性合作、提高编委国际化程度、适当扩大论文规模、加快出版流程、加强市场营销意识、塑造国际品牌形象以及关注国内外出版及评价领域新动向等. 相似文献