共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
2.
ISI数据库收录的开放存取期刊现状分析 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
通过对DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Joumals)及Open Science Directory两个开放存取期刊集成平台进行统计,对开放存取期刊的现状进行概述,同时介绍开放存取期刊被ISI数据库收录的情况,并从国家、学科分布两个方面对其进行了分析评述,希望能够促进科研人员及图书管理人员对开放存取期刊的了解. 相似文献
3.
建设开放存取期刊集成平台、提供开放存取期刊"一站式"服务、资助作者发表开放存取期刊论文等都需要对期刊进行遴选。文章以DOAJ和GoOA为对象,对开放存取期刊集成平台的期刊遴选进行调研;以杜克大学、麻省理工学院、隆德大学、卡耐基梅隆大学为对象,对开放存取期刊论文APC资助的期刊遴选进行调研,分析总结开放存取期刊遴选的原则及特点,以期为其他主体、其他用途的期刊遴选提供借鉴。 相似文献
4.
中国大陆开放存取期刊实践现状研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
国际上开放存取期刊的发展取得了巨大成就,我国学者关注开放存取期刊的研究也超过5年,但我国大陆地区的开放存取期刊建设现状却很落后。据国际开放存取期刊收录目录DOAJ数据统计,到目前为止我国大陆地区仅注册33种。文章从开放存取期刊建设现状入手,分析其建设落后的原因并提出建设建议以加快我国大陆地区开放存取期刊的建设步伐。 相似文献
5.
6.
目前国内外认知度较高的开放存取期刊资源整合平台主要有:DOAJ、Open J-Gate、Socolar。文章对这三大开放存取期刊资源整合平台的总体情况进行了概述,然后从平台收录的资源情况、检索功能、检索结果等方面对三大开放存取期刊资源整合平台进行了比较分析。 相似文献
7.
随着开放存取运动的迅速发展,开放存取期刊数量大幅增加,文章以DOAJ平台上的图情领域开放存取期刊作为研究对象,分析了解图情领域开放存取期刊发行现况、开放存取政策及期刊的影响力。同时,从制定合理的开放存取政策、通过统一平台集成开放存取期刊资源、实施同行评审制保证开放存取期刊的质量等方面提出了促进该学科期刊开放存取的建议。 相似文献
8.
9.
文章概括了开放存取资源的基本特点,指出开放存取对图书馆期刊采购、图书馆服务、馆藏建设、信息保存等方面存在的影响.分析当前网络环境下,图书馆界对开放存取应持有的态度:图书馆应积极支持和参与开放存取,不但要成为开放存取运动的宣传者,而且还要自建开放存取资源,提供数字存档仓库,并积极开发、利用开放存取资源. 相似文献
10.
开放存取期刊学术质量评价(三)——基于即年指标视角的分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
运用即年指标这一评价期刊学术质量的重要指标,系统分析2006—2010年收录DOAJ期刊即年指标随时间、学科和地域三个维度变化的情况,以了解开放存取期刊的学术质量。 相似文献
11.
DOAJ( Directory of Open Acess Journals)是目前国际上最具影响力的开放获取期刊平台。DOAJ收录的范围很广泛,囊括所有学科的开放获取期刊,只要期刊有严格的质量控制体系,能够保证期刊内容的质量,即可申请收录;但我国被DOAJ收录的期刊仍不多。本文简单介绍DOAJ评选程序和申请过程,并结合《口腔疾病防治》被DOAJ收录的过程谈几点体会,希望能给编辑同人提供参考;同时提示申请加入DOAJ应提前做好准备、加强期刊官网建设、提高摘要质量、保证高质量的英文信息以及做好后续工作。 相似文献
12.
国内外开放获取期刊现状调查研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
本文对DOAJ、HighWire出版社期刊开放仓储网络平台、日本科技信息网络电子平台、巴西科学在线图书馆、BioMed Central开放获取期刊网络出版平台等8个知名的期刊数据库/检索平台进行统计,将开放存取期刊按照出版社、ISSN、期刊名称、数据库检索平台、学科分类及出版国家信息以Excel列表。将统计所得的数据与艾利贝斯公司SFX知识库中的开放存取期刊列表去重合并,截止2009年3月,共统计开放存取期刊12531种,并以此数据为基础对国内外开放存取期刊现状进行研究。 相似文献
13.
Jingfeng XIA 《Learned Publishing》2015,28(1):69-74
This study examines the payment policies of a list of standalone predatory open access journals available on scholarlyoa.com . It is found that 72% do charge article publication fees (APCs), which is a higher percentage than found in DOAJ journals. The mean number of articles published during 2013 was 227, but ranged from 4 to 2,286 articles. The majority of journals charge low APCs and can be assumed to have modest annual incomes. There was no correlation between the amount of APC charged and the number of articles published. Comparing the number of journals charging APCs compared to the percentage from DOAJ, the findings suggest a connection between predatory practices and charging author fees. However, a comprehensive assessment of the dynamics of open access journal publishing beyond author charges should be done to avoid using APCs alone as a measure of whether a journal is predatory or not. 相似文献
14.
《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2022,48(3):102516
This study aims to present a quantitative analysis of open access (OA) journals in the field of medicine indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The bibliographic data for this study was extracted from DOAJ and inserted into an Excel sheet for analysis. The retrieved data was analyzed by using different quantitative techniques to disclose the findings. The findings disclosed that 3627 OA journals related to the field of medicine are indexed in DOAJ, which represents a substantial increase from just 8 in 2002. Moreover, most of the medical journals (n = 1874 or 51.7%) do not charge any Author Processing Charges (APC) from the authors. The United Kingdom leads the world with 878 (24%) open access journal titles, whereas English is the top language of publication with 3149 (86.8%) OA journals in medicine. Elsevier is the leading publisher with 236 (6.5%) journal titles. A majority of the journals (n = 1595 or 44%) follow a double blind, peer-review process. About 2046 (56.4%) journals publish their contents under the Creative Commons (CC BY) licensing model to enable access and use of scholarly content for educational purposes. 相似文献
15.
16.
17.
Bo‐Christer Bjrk 《Learned Publishing》2019,32(3):227-236
The number of open access (OA) journals and their share of all scholarly journals are usually estimated based on indexing in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). DOAJ's coverage of OA journals from different regions of the world is, however, far from complete, particularly of journals publishing in languages other than English. Using alternative data sources for identification and manual verification, 437 scholarly OA journals published in the five Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden) were identified, and some key characteristics were studied. Of these, only 184 were indexed in DOAJ. A vast majority of the journals was published by scholarly societies or universities. Social sciences and humanities dominated as topics, and few journals charge authors. National or university‐specific OJS portals have played a major role in enabling OA publishing. Around a third of the Nordic scholarly journals are currently OA. 相似文献
18.
Li Sun 《Learned Publishing》2019,32(3):207-211
Researchers applauded Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)’s new selection criteria that removed many existing journals from its index because they are ‘Not Adhering to Best Practice’. However, many of these journals have acceptable scholarly quality. The present study compares such removed journals to a trustworthy bibliometric database, SCImago Journal & Country Rank (the Scopus Database). It finds many overlaps. Some of the overlapping journals have a high score in the SCImago ranks. This paper calls for a more transparent process of journal reviews by DOAJ or even a re‐examination of the selection criteria and/or the evaluation process. 相似文献