共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 187 毫秒
1.
2.
大型精品图书的策划与出版是一项系统工程.医学类图书专业性强,其出版除了要遵循一般图书出版的规律,还要兼顾医学自身的特点.出版单位只有统筹规划,立足学科优势选定题目和高水平作者,精心编排内容,做好出版过程中的田间管理,强化专业团队的协作能力,建立各项保障机制,做好精准营销,才能打造出一流的大型精品医学图书. 相似文献
3.
4.
出版高质量的单行本以增加科技期刊收益 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
中华医学会系列杂志所刊载的医学论文的单行本是近年来读者和客户需求不断增长的新产品,是中华医学会系列杂志品牌服务的延伸,不但深受作者和广大客户的欢迎,而且能给期刊编辑部带来一定的经济效益.加强并规范单行本制作流程,制作销售高质量的单行本是增加科技期刊收入、促进学术交流、扩大期刊宣传的重要手段之一. 相似文献
5.
文章分析了在中国数字出版蓬勃发展的背景下,科技期刊数字出版的特点,并在此基础上从网络技术的安全隐患、盗版网站的隐患、版权保护意识与制度三个方面讨论了当前中国科技期刊数字出版面临的安全保护问题,以期为科技期刊从传统出版向数字出版合理转型提供借鉴. 相似文献
6.
在数字化时代,我国科技期刊面临着新的发展机遇和挑战,其出版方式也已经发生重大变化。文章分析了我国科技期刊数字出版的现状,以及存在的标准不统一、数字化出版优势不明显和缺少知识产权保护等相关问题,并指出,传统科技期刊和现代数字化科技期刊都是当代科技信息资源的重要载体,传统出版要积极主动利用数字化,融入数字化。 相似文献
7.
8.
我国科技期刊数字出版的SWOT分析 总被引：4，自引：2，他引：2
我国科技期刊数字出版虽然有较快发展,但与欧美发达国家相比仍处于落后状态.通过采用SWOT分析的方法,从优势、劣势、机遇、威胁4个方面对我国科技期刊数字出版所具有的内、外部条件等方面的情况进行全面概括和综合分析,以期为发展我国科技期刊的数字出版提供参考. 相似文献
9.
信息技术的发展推动了科技期刊数字化进程。将区块链推广至科技出版的应用场景,提出科技期刊数字出版平台的理论模型,阐述了其应用流程及具体优势,认为使用区块链扩充出版规模与能力,通过智能合约和平台代币强化评审规范与权责,依托加密算法和学术法院实现知识确权与维权是未来我国科技期刊数字出版平台转型与服务创新的途径之一。 相似文献
10.
法律文献单行本具有出版形式简单、时效性强、内容不断修订,以及同时收录多个法律条文的特点,因此著录时应对其发布时间、责任说明、收录内容等作完整的揭示,以便于读者的利用. 相似文献
11.
12.
本文具体介绍了通过互联网查阅国内外医学期刊数据库及其站点的方法。国内医学期刊数据库及其站点包括：CNKI中国期刊网、重庆维普资讯和万方数据数字化期刊。国外医学期刊数据库及其站点则包括：OCLC的Firstsearch、Ingenta、科学杂志在线、英国医学杂志、美国医学会期刊出版物以及免费医学期刊索引，对用户选用医学期刊数据库查询相关文献提供参考。 相似文献
13.
Journal articles are the most common publication format for U.S. academic health sciences librarians. This is consistent with the findings of other researchers. Of the total publications in this study, 68% were in journals. Watson found that 69% of the academic librarians' publications were published in some type of journal [8]. Similarly, Yerkey and Glogowski found that 67% of the publications in their study were journal articles, although their population consisted of all types of authors of library/information science materials [9]. Both the present study and Watson found that monographs were the second most common publication outlet. Watson found that 16% of the total publications were monographs; the current study identified 14.8% of the total publications as monographs [10]. Although Watson's findings are similar to the newer results, it is important to note that Watson's study was conducted in a different manner and included book reviews, which were not counted in the present study. The health sciences librarians in the present study published more than two thirds of their articles in library/information science journals and 27% in health sciences journals. Similarly, in Yerkey and Glogowski's study, the second-largest number of library/information science articles appeared in medical and health sciences journals [11]. Fang also found that 22.57% of the journal articles on health sciences librarianship or by health sciences librarians were in medical journals [12. This seems to demonstrate the desire of health sciences librarians to communicate with the health professionals. Yerkey and Glogowski that library and information science is an interdisciplinary field, "borrowing and supplying information to and from other disciplines"[13]. 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
V. V. Ivanov V. A. Markusova L. E. Mindeli A. V. Zolotova 《Scientific and Technical Information Processing》2018,45(3):182-191
The review of the research of the Open-Access system of journals and its advantages and disadvantages are presented. The bibliometric analysis was carried out for the array of Russian papers published in the journals of the Gold Open Access system and reflected in the SCI-E database for 2008–2017. The results of the analysis of the publication activity showed that, despite the high payments for papers, there was a steady increase in the share of Russian publications in such journals compared to the overall publication activity of Russia: from 7.8% in 2008 to 13.7% in 2017. This is largely due to active international cooperation of Russian organizations with funding agencies from the United States (31%), Germany (29%), and other industrialized countries. Analysis of the array of Gold OA publications in large research areas made it possible to establish a significant difference in its structure compared to the general array of publications in Russia. As an example, the most important scientific field in the world, Research Area Scientific Technologies, was ranked the third in comparison with the ninth rank in the general array.russian scientists widely use high-quality foreign journals of the Gold OA system, which includes one Russian journal, Solid State Physics. 相似文献
17.
This study aims to investigate the altmetric activity of papers published by the University of Zagreb School of Medicine in internationally visible journals and to identify differences in altmetric activity between the papers published in international and local journals and between those published in English and Croatian. We also investigated changes in altmetric activity over time and the characteristics of papers with the highest Twitter and Mendeley activity.The sample included 390 papers collected from the bibliographic database Scopus. Their altmetric and citation activities were measured at three time points: in July 2014, 2015, and 2016.The findings generally correspond to those observed in the large-scale studies of medical papers. Papers in renowned journals, and papers reporting clinical guidelines and multicentric studies had the most intense altmetric activity. In contrast, papers published in local, Croatian journals showed minimal altmetric activity, especially the papers published in Croatian. These results indicate that the local publishing community has not yet recognised social media as a tool for promoting research and that non-English language publications have minimal chances to receive attention, even in social media.The evaluative potential of altmetric indicators has to be further explored in a broader context. 相似文献
18.
Abstract This paper provides a methodology to study the characteristics of the research output from a university department. The faculty publications and their cited references over a 10-year period were used as the basis for this study to identify their publishing patterns and the types of material they are publishing; a core set of journals and other resources they are publishing in and citing over this period; the characteristics of the journals in which they publish and cite; the degree of openness of their publications and their citation advantage; and the age of resources that are referenced. 相似文献
19.
20.
Sandra L De Groote Mary Shultz Marceline Doranski 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2005,93(2):223-228
PURPOSE: The purpose was to determine the impact of online journals on the citation patterns of medical faculty. This study looked at whether researchers were more likely to limit the resources they consulted and cited to those journals available online rather than those only in print. SETTING: Faculty publications from the college of medicine at a large urban university were examined for this study. The faculty publications from a regional medical college of the same university were also examined in the study. The number of online journals available for faculty, staff, and students at this institution has increased from an initial core of 15 online journals in 1998 to over 11,000 online journals in 2004. METHODOLOGY: Searches by author affiliation were performed in the Web of Science to find all articles written by faculty members in the college of medicine at the selected institution. Searches were conducted for the following years: 1993, 1996, 1999, and 2002. Cited references from each faculty-authored article were recorded, and the corresponding cited journals were coded into four categories based on their availability at the institution in this study: print only, print and online, online only, and not owned. Results were analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS: The number of journals cited per year continued to increase from 1993 to 2002. The results did not indicate that researchers were more likely to cite online journals or were less likely to cite journals only in print. At the regional location where the number of print-only journals was minimal, use of the print-only journals did decrease in 2002, although not significantly. CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: It is possible that electronic access to information (i.e., online databases) has had a positive impact on the number of articles faculty will cite. Results of this study suggest, at this point, that faculty are still accessing the print-only collection, at least for research purposes, and are therefore not sacrificing quality for convenience. 相似文献