共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 477 毫秒
1.
通过计算机检索万方和中国知网数据库2013—2018年被撤销的中文科技论文,统计被撤销论文的基本信息(发表期刊、论文题名、发表时间及卷期号、撤销时间、撤稿方、撤稿原因、编辑部处理方法及撤销后的引用情况等),调查我国中文科技论文被撤销的情况及撤销后论文继续被收录和引用的情况。共205篇被撤销科技论文纳入研究,涉及145种期刊。184篇(89.8%)来自自然科学类期刊;撤稿时滞为1～145个月;著作权、知识产权纠纷是撤稿最主要的原因;撤稿声明发布后还有59篇论文可以在数据库中在线阅读和下载全文,其中31篇论文依然被其他学者引用。结果表明期刊及相关学术机构应加强学术不端的审查和宣传,规范撤稿机制及流程。 相似文献
2.
以中国知网的撤销论文声明为样本,调查我国当前撤销论文的主体构成,并与国外的撤销声明主体进行对比,分析我国撤销论文声明的特征。调查表明:截至2018年12月,中国知网撤销论文声明的主体为:编辑部64%,作者13%,无署名11%,编委会9%,其他3%。撤销的多为学术不端论文,撤销主体以期刊方为主;作者、作者机构、社会团体等其他主体在撤销论文中的作用还急需增强。提高各个主体的参与度,并建立撤销论文制度,将促进我国论文撤销的合理开展。 相似文献
3.
针对当前日渐增多的学术不端论文被撤销的现象,探讨中文学术期刊论文被撤销原因失真的一些现状:论文被撤销却未刊登撤销声明、撤销论文却未给出明确的原因和论文撤销的原因与实际不符等.认为被撤销论文原因失真由多方面因素造成:1)国家和行业层面,我国关于论文撤销的规范有待进一步健全;2)学术期刊层面,其调查权力和范围有限,担心事件调查的时间成本以及作者起诉等法律风险而使撤销原因失真,并存在撤销论文会引起读者质疑期刊权威性的误解;3)作者层面,涉及学术不端论文的作者为了减小学术不端行为对声誉的影响不愿坦诚其行为,而涉及诚实性错误的论文撤销作者可能怕读者质疑其学术能力而不愿意刊登原因.建议从制定论文撤销规范、规范学术期刊撤销行为和营造良性科研氛围等方面,促进我国学术环境的进一步净化. 相似文献
4.
5.
科学文献数据库中撤销论文分布规律研究--以Web of Science数据库为例 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
随着撤销论文数量地不断增加,科学文献数据库对撤销论文标注地日益规范以及学术界对撤销论文现象地逐步重视,相关研究越来越多。本文以Web of Science数据库中撤销论文数据为研究对象,从年份、学科、国家、期刊、机构及作者等6个方面对撤销论文的分布规律及特点进行分析总结。以期在揭示国际科学文献数据库中撤销论文分布特点的同时,提高我国科研管理部门、文献数据库商、期刊编辑和科研人员等对撤销论文及其不良影响的关注,进一步规范对撤销论文的标注。促进学术期刊出版机构及科研管理部门建立健全相应的管理机制,制定行之有效的管理措施,遏制我国学术不端行为的发生。 相似文献
6.
文章收集万方和PubMed数据库中被撤销论文的撤销时间、第一作者所在国家及地区、撤销原因等,进行统计学分析和排序研究,并提出应对学术论文撤销的措施.在设定检索时段内,在万方和PubMed数据库中,分别检索到40篇与178篇被撤销论文.两家数据库被撤销论文的年份分布构成比比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.297).万方数据库中,被撤销论文前三位的地区分别为北京、广东、湖南.PubMed数据库中,中国被撤销论文数量最多,超过总撤稿量的三分之一,被撤销论文前三位的地区分别为上海、北京、广东.两家数据库论文被撤销的前三大原因,均分别为损害他人著作权或知识产权,一稿多投及数据/图、表重复发表,差错.然后,就应对我国学术论文撤销的严峻形势,我们提出建议,分别从国家层面、编辑层面、编辑部层面和数据库层面采取措施,遏制论文发表中的学术行为不端. 相似文献
7.
本文对SCOPUS 数据库收录的撤销论文进行统计分析,结果发现约 97% 的撤销论文是会议论文,学科领域集中于计算机科学,工程,商业、管理和会计学,2010 年和2011 年的撤销论文异常多,其余年份的撤销论文较少。撤销会议论文绝大多数由IEEE Computer Society 出版,会议举办地点多在中国城市,部分会议论文集的论文撤销率达到75%,不少会议论文由于违反了IEEE 出版原则而被撤销。撤销论文的总体学术影响力较低,论文被引用率为15.7%,篇均被引频次为0.33。 相似文献
8.
近年来学术不端现象日益突出,学术造假行为引起学术界的关注。期刊加强了对学术不端论文的处理力度,及时撤销,以降低其影响力。该文依据现有定量研究成果,同时借鉴期刊影响因子的思想,构建了期刊撤销影响因子(Retracted Impact Factor,简称RIF),以此来评判期刊的负影响指数。通过统计2011年Web of Science数据库中的撤销论文数据,分别计算了2011年18种期刊的撤销影响因子。最后,对期刊撤销影响因子与期刊影响因子之间的关系进行探析,寻找出二者间存在的定量关系,以期提高学术界和公众对撤销论文这一现象的关注。 相似文献
9.
关于科技学术期刊论文更正和撤销的讨论 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
科技学术期刊论文的更正和撤销是一个不容忽视的问题。"撤稿"不同于"撤销论文"(已发表论文的撤销)。应鼓励学术期刊设置更正、论文撤销栏目。学术期刊的纸质版与电子版或网络数据库的论文更正和撤销应一致。 相似文献
10.
收集 Web of Science（WoS）数据库的高被引撤销论文数据,分析其分布规律和引证特征。结果发现,TOP20%高被引撤销论文430篇,分布于31个国家,多学科领域最多,35种期刊>3篇。高被引撤销论文撤销时滞和撤销论文总被引频次相关性较弱（P=0.014）,和撤销前被引频次相关性较强（P=0.000）。期刊 IF和撤销论文数量、撤销论文总被引频次、撤销论文篇均被引频次正相关（P=0.017、P=0.000、P=0.005）。撤销后年均被引频次低于撤销前（P=0.000）。本研究说明 IF 高的期刊发表的撤销论文对学术界带来的负面影响较大,撤销时滞延长增加了撤销前引用,撤销起到了一定的净化效果,但是净化效果还不理想,建议国内外学者加强对撤销论文及其不良影响的关注。 相似文献
11.
国内学术期刊刊登撤稿声明的分析 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
刊登撤稿声明是学术期刊配合学术打假的重要手段。分析从国内数据库中检索到的45篇撤稿声明和被撤的55篇论文,发现因各种学术不端引起的撤稿占64％,大多数被撤论文仍能在数据库中找到全文。初步探讨了被撤论文的特点和发布撤稿声明时应注意的问题。 相似文献
12.
国外撤销论文研究综述 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
以国外撤销论文的相关研究为基础,从定性与定量研究、医学与非医学数据库研究、撤销原因、撤销论文的引用情况等几个方面对前人研究成果进行梳理总结,概述撤销论文的研究现状,以期对我国科研管理、期刊管理、科研评价以及遏制学术不端行为等方面政策的制订提供参考。 相似文献
13.
J M Budd M Sievert T R Schultz C Scoville 《Bulletin of the Medical Library Association》1999,87(4):437-443
At times, there are reasons for authors to make a formal statement of retraction of work they publish in biomedical journals. This study examines 235 retracted articles and looks at the reasons for these retractions and citations to the articles subsequent to retraction. The primary reasons for retraction are error of various kinds (such as problems with method or sample, including contamination of samples) and misconduct. The 235 articles are cited a total of 2,034 times after retraction. This set of citations can be divided into two groups: citations that appear in journals included in the Abridged Index Medicus and those that appear in other journals included in MEDLINE. While most of the citations in these two groups of journals can be categorized as "implicitly positive," 275 make explicitly positive mention of retracted articles. The implications for continued citation for biomedical research and clinical practice are discussed. 相似文献
14.
在国际著名的摘要和引文数据库Scopus中检索2015-2017年医学领域国际期刊的撤稿声明,收集并分析撤稿声明中的相关信息.检索后共获得1 015篇针对已发表正式论文的撤稿声明,声明数量逐年减少.发表撤稿声明较多的期刊,普遍质量不高,撤稿数量和期刊影响因子并没有明显的相关性.从Scopus上可以获得能提供有效撤稿相关信息的声明摘要共409篇,涉及文章419篇,学术不端是撤稿的主要原因,占所有撤稿原因的46.8％.撤稿文章来自38个国家,其中数量最多的为中国(97篇)、美国(95篇)、伊朗(53篇)、日本(28篇)、印度(22篇)、英国(14篇)、韩国(11篇).几乎所有国家的撤稿原因中都包括学术不端或重复发表.撤稿声明时滞为0～26年,中位数2年,平均值3.3年.学术不端的撤稿时滞中位数为3年,重复发表的撤稿时滞中位数为1年. 相似文献
15.
Quan‐Hoang Vuong 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(2):119-130
While researchers with retracted papers – publications that are withdrawn because of significant errors or scientific misconduct – carry a permanent stain on their publishing records, understanding the causes and initiators of such retractions can shed a different light on the matter. This paper, based on a random sample of 2,046 retracted papers, which were published between 1975 and 2019, extracted from Retraction Watch and the websites of major publishers, shows that 53% of the retraction notices do not specify who initiated the retraction. Nearly 10% of the retraction notes either omit or do not contain information related to reasons for retractions. Furthermore, most of the retracted papers in our sample have no limitation section; those who do are commonly unhelpful or irrelevant. The results carry three implications for scientific transparency: retraction notices need to be more informative; limitation sections ought to be a required and even an open section of all published articles; and finally, promoting ‘heroic acts’ in science can positively change the current publishing culture. 相似文献
16.
Rada RF 《Health information and libraries journal》2007,24(3):210-215
OBJECTIVES: To explore how often newspapers cover the retraction of a medical journal article and whether newspaper coverage corresponds with the appearance of a press release about the retraction. METHODS: Fifty citations were identified in PubMed that had been indexed with the Medical Subject Heading 'Retracted Publication'. Next, the archives of LexisNexis's 'Major Newspapers' and EurekAlert's press releases were searched to find references to those retracted publications. RESULTS: Newspaper articles addressed exactly three of the 50 retracted publications, and press releases, exactly four of the 50 retracted publications. All three retracted publications that received newspaper coverage also had a press release. In other words, newspapers only covered a retraction that had been introduced by a press release. CONCLUSION: One would expect that newspaper coverage would increase after a press release, but the suggested relationships among a medical journal article retraction, a press release and newspaper coverage should be further investigated. If the linkage suggested by the data of this study holds, and if newspaper coverage stimulates library patron interest, then a medical library might prepare itself for information requests following a press release. 相似文献
17.
�ҹ�1991��1995�����ݿ��о����� 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
统计分析了１９９１～１９９５年我国１０种图书馆学情报学核心期刊上发表的有关数据库的论文３１３篇，研究数据库文献在各个主题的分布情况、文献发展的变化和被忽略的领域 相似文献
18.
Kathleen A. Amos 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2014,102(2):87-91
This study explored national differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication in retracted biomedical literature. The national affiliations of authors and reasons for retraction of papers accessible through PubMed that were published from 2008 to 2012 and subsequently retracted were determined in order to identify countries with the largest numbers and highest rates of retraction due to plagiarism and duplicate publication. Authors from more than fifty countries retracted papers. While the United States retracted the most papers, China retracted the most papers for plagiarism and duplicate publication. Rates of plagiarism and duplicate publication were highest in Italy and Finland, respectively. Unethical publishing practices cut across nations. 相似文献
19.
《Journal of Informetrics》2023,17(3):101423
Retractions are necessary to remove flawed research from citable literature but cannot offset the negative impact those publications have on science advances and public trust. The editorial peer-review process is intended to prevent flawed research from being published. However, there is limited empirical evidence of its effectiveness in identifying issues that lead to retractions. This study analyzed the peer-review comments (provided by Clarivate Analytics) for a sample of retracted publications (provided by Retraction Watch) to investigate how the peer-review process effectively detects the areas where the retraction causes lie and whether reviewer characteristics are related to the effectiveness. We found that a small proportion of peer reviews suggested rejections during the peer review stage, while about half suggested acceptance or minor revision for those later retracted papers. The peer-review process was more effective in identifying retraction causes related to data, methods, and results than those related to text plagiarism and references. Additionally, factors such as reviewer seniority and the level of match between reviewers’ expertise and the submission were significant in determining the possibility of peer reviews identifying suspicious areas in submissions. We discussed potential insights from these findings and called for collective efforts to prevent retractions. 相似文献