共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
通过计算机检索万方和中国知网数据库2013—2018年被撤销的中文科技论文,统计被撤销论文的基本信息(发表期刊、论文题名、发表时间及卷期号、撤销时间、撤稿方、撤稿原因、编辑部处理方法及撤销后的引用情况等),调查我国中文科技论文被撤销的情况及撤销后论文继续被收录和引用的情况。共205篇被撤销科技论文纳入研究,涉及145种期刊。184篇(89.8%)来自自然科学类期刊;撤稿时滞为1～145个月;著作权、知识产权纠纷是撤稿最主要的原因;撤稿声明发布后还有59篇论文可以在数据库中在线阅读和下载全文,其中31篇论文依然被其他学者引用。结果表明期刊及相关学术机构应加强学术不端的审查和宣传,规范撤稿机制及流程。 相似文献
2.
近年来,随着学术不端行为导致的撤稿事件频发,撤稿声明在中国SCI期刊上发表的数量也日渐增长.越来越多的期刊需要处理疑似学术不端行为稿件的撤稿事宜,编辑部面临着前所未有的挑战.本研究通过对2016-2020年间Web of Science数据库核心合集收录的中国SCI期刊(不含港澳台地区)刊发的撤稿声明进行调查,记录并分析了相关撤稿声明的信息,包括发表的期刊、期刊所属学科、发表时间及卷期号、题目、类型、被撤稿论文发表时间及其撤稿后的引用情况等.调查结果显示,我国SCI期刊的撤稿声明发文规范整体良好,但还有许多不足,期刊编辑部需要进一步提高撤稿意识、完善撤稿机制、规范撤稿要求,接轨国际标准,从而保证刊发论文的科学性和准确性,维护期刊的学术声誉,为建设世界一流科技期刊提供保障. 相似文献
3.
介绍处理3篇论文撤稿的具体做法: 1)编辑部主动对“内容不真”的论文撤稿;2)因重复发表作者主动申请撤稿而编辑部决定不撤稿时,刊登重复发表声明。分析国内学术期刊处理撤稿面临的伦理问题:1)怎么合理表述撤稿原因？2)首发期刊根据什么来决定是否撤稿？3)首发期刊决定不撤稿,重复发表期刊也不撤稿,首发期刊怎么办？4)重复发表论文还存在其他学术不端行为的怎么办？针对上述问题提出了相应的处理建议。 相似文献
4.
本文对中国知网、万方数据库中检索到的撤稿声明进行逐条字段标记,以撤稿原因为主轴,对撤稿时序、撤稿驱动主体等进行交叉统计分析,并对中国知网、万方数据库的撤稿声明收录和原文处理情况进行比较研究,发现国内期刊撤稿特征表现为学术不端撤稿占比最大,学术不端撤稿隐性集中爆发风险大,作者驱动撤稿最多,数据库撤稿处理不规范.在此基础上为期刊、数据库的相关建设提出针对性的对策及建议:期刊的撤稿声明要明确撤稿原因,对作者自行撤稿行为应高度关注并加强监管,还需规范撤稿调查处理流程且做到科学有据;国内数据库要加强撤稿的规范化建设. 相似文献
5.
6.
刊登撤稿声明是学术期刊配合学术打假的重要手段。分析从国内数据库中检索到的45篇撤稿声明和被撤的55篇论文,发现因各种学术不端引起的撤稿占64％,大多数被撤论文仍能在数据库中找到全文。初步探讨了被撤论文的特点和发布撤稿声明时应注意的问题。 相似文献
7.
本文采用中国知网和中文期刊学术平台综合检索撤稿声明，统计论文撤稿原因及撤稿声明刊登后的被引频次，比较2个数据库对撤稿论文的处理情况，检索撤稿论文在网络平台和期刊官网中的状态，并对施引文献的引用态度进行分析，以期从施引期刊、数据库、施引者等角度分析撤稿论文被引的原因，并提出应对对策。结果发现，撤稿论文所涉主题关注度较高、施引者引用不当、施引期刊难以把握撤稿论文的被引、数据库间撤稿流程存在差异是撤稿论文被引的主要原因。因此，建议提升作者科研数据管理意识，引入全文本引文分析，判断撤稿论文被引用的学术价值，加强各环节学术不端行为的监管力度，规范数据库间撤稿流程和网络平台、期刊官网撤稿要求。 相似文献
8.
国际期刊大规模密集撤稿和反学术不端网站曝光的造假丑闻显示了我国学术不端的存在.防范学术不端是期刊编辑义不容辞的职责.虽然撤销已发表论文是国际期刊防范学术不端的重要手段之一,但是研究结果显示,我国期刊还没有真正地发挥撤销论文的威力.在我国还没有专业的反学术不端网站,也没有高端的反学术不端检测软件的情况下,我国期刊应在学术不端检测的基础上,再向前跨出一步,构建一个已发表论文跟踪评价系统,充分发挥读者的监督作用,将漏网的学术不端论文挖掘出来,然后像其他国际期刊一样利用撤稿利器打击和防范学术不端. 相似文献
9.
10.
随着生物医学领域文献发表量的快速增加,撤稿量也随之增加。本文通过检索PubMed收录的关于中国作者发表文章的撤稿文件,对其中的信息进行提取和统计学分析。结果显示:1)生物医学领域中国作者撤稿在2005年后进入快速增长,平均撤稿时间为16.55月,撤稿主要集中在影响因子为0～3的期刊(58.9％)。2)撤稿原因分别为重复发表或抄袭(40%),科学错误(15％),作者署名或版权问题(8%),伪造数据或怀疑伪造数据(5%)。3)因科学错误、重复发表或抄袭、伪造数据或怀疑伪造数据而撤稿的期刊平均影响因子之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。4)非SCI给出不详撤稿信息的比例明显高于SCI期刊(P<0.05)。撤稿行为是对缺陷科学结论纠错的有效措施,从PubMed收录的对中国作者的撤稿声明分析中可以发现某些中国作者科学失范行为的模式,以及科技期刊编辑部对待撤稿的态度,并可借鉴经验制定出有针对性的措施,促进国内期刊出版环境的净化。 相似文献
11.
以中国知网的撤销论文声明为样本,调查我国当前撤销论文的主体构成,并与国外的撤销声明主体进行对比,分析我国撤销论文声明的特征。调查表明:截至2018年12月,中国知网撤销论文声明的主体为:编辑部64%,作者13%,无署名11%,编委会9%,其他3%。撤销的多为学术不端论文,撤销主体以期刊方为主;作者、作者机构、社会团体等其他主体在撤销论文中的作用还急需增强。提高各个主体的参与度,并建立撤销论文制度,将促进我国论文撤销的合理开展。 相似文献
12.
《Journal of Informetrics》2014,8(4):912-916
This paper examined the citation impact of Chinese- and English-language articles in Chinese-English bilingual journals indexed by Scopus and Web of Science (WoS). Two findings were obtained from comparative analysis: (1) Chinese-language articles were not biased in citations compared with English-language articles, since they received a large number of citations from Chinese scientists; (2) a Chinese-language community was found in Scopus, in which Chinese-language articles mainly received citations from Chinese-language articles, but it was not found in WoS whose coverage of Chinese-language articles is only one-tenth of Scopus. The findings suggest some implications for academic evaluation of journals including Chinese-language articles in Scopus and WoS. 相似文献
13.
分析PubMed数据库中撤销的造假论文的特征及学术净化效果.发现近10年间撤销造假论文433篇,分布在25个国家,日本最多,美国次之,其次是德国、印度和中国.造假论文分布在178种期刊上,主要涉及数据、图片造假.造假论文数量大致是逐年增长.撤销主体主要是作者、主编、编辑.造假论文撤销前后年均被引频次差异显著(P＜0.05).揭示了撤销的造假论文的主要分布特征及对学术界的净化效果.造假现象的严峻形势希望能够给研究者以警示,并强调作者、编辑在学术环境净化中的主体作用. 相似文献
14.
15.
文章收集万方和PubMed数据库中被撤销论文的撤销时间、第一作者所在国家及地区、撤销原因等,进行统计学分析和排序研究,并提出应对学术论文撤销的措施.在设定检索时段内,在万方和PubMed数据库中,分别检索到40篇与178篇被撤销论文.两家数据库被撤销论文的年份分布构成比比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.297).万方数据库中,被撤销论文前三位的地区分别为北京、广东、湖南.PubMed数据库中,中国被撤销论文数量最多,超过总撤稿量的三分之一,被撤销论文前三位的地区分别为上海、北京、广东.两家数据库论文被撤销的前三大原因,均分别为损害他人著作权或知识产权,一稿多投及数据/图、表重复发表,差错.然后,就应对我国学术论文撤销的严峻形势,我们提出建议,分别从国家层面、编辑层面、编辑部层面和数据库层面采取措施,遏制论文发表中的学术行为不端. 相似文献
16.
J M Budd M Sievert T R Schultz C Scoville 《Bulletin of the Medical Library Association》1999,87(4):437-443
At times, there are reasons for authors to make a formal statement of retraction of work they publish in biomedical journals. This study examines 235 retracted articles and looks at the reasons for these retractions and citations to the articles subsequent to retraction. The primary reasons for retraction are error of various kinds (such as problems with method or sample, including contamination of samples) and misconduct. The 235 articles are cited a total of 2,034 times after retraction. This set of citations can be divided into two groups: citations that appear in journals included in the Abridged Index Medicus and those that appear in other journals included in MEDLINE. While most of the citations in these two groups of journals can be categorized as "implicitly positive," 275 make explicitly positive mention of retracted articles. The implications for continued citation for biomedical research and clinical practice are discussed. 相似文献
17.
[目的/意义]回顾图情档学科五年内的研究进展,有助于掌握本领域知识域的结构与演变。[方法/过程]使用文献计量法,对近5年图情档学科领域的20种中文期刊文献,从发文总量、高被引论文、学术影响力、研究热点及研究趋势预测等角度进行计量研究。[结果/结论]研究发现中文期刊发文量逐年下降,外文论文发文量年度占比逐年增长,领域内研究逐渐与国际接轨;学科领域持续跟进基础理论研究和实践创新研究,对数据研究、数字人文也保持着高度关注;处于数字与数据化的环境中,图情档学科领域亟待完成学科体系与能力的重构,趋向于数据科学和大数据方向;领域研究更加关注用户体验和信息资源共建共享。 相似文献
18.
Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh Muzammil Tahira A. Abrizah 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2017,33(4):421-432
Over the years, the number of journals indexed in Scopus has increased, although it varies significantly between countries. The increasing proportion of international journals of a country provides new venues for papers from that country to be seen by other researchers worldwide. In this work, we evaluate the relationship of a country’s scientific performance or publication success with both its journals’ quantity and quality. The specific objective of the study is to identify the relationship between the country’s publication success and the quantity and quality of those country’s journals indexed in Scopus during 2005–2014. The publication success of 102 individual countries, measured by their scientific productivity, impact and collaboration indicators, the quantity of country’s Scopus-indexed journals in 2014 (a total of 22,581 journals) as well as the quantity of its journals were investigated. Scopus-indexed journals are predominantly from Western Europe (48.9%) and North America (27.7%), with the United States and the United Kingdom dominate with a total 51%. The contribution from the peripheral countries is comparatively small, however there are a good number of contributions from the South-East Asian countries. Estonia is the fastest growing country in terms of having indexed journals in Scopus, following by Iran and Malaysia. Among the studied indices, it was found that publication success (total publications and total citations) of 102 countries are strongly correlated with quantity (number of indexed journals and number of documents published in indexed journals) and quality (citations per paper, SJR, h-index, CiteScore and SNIP) indicators of country’s journals. We can conclude that the scientific productivity of a country depend critically on the number of journals indexed from that country in citation databases. The study provides a context with which the relative success of publications can be assessed, yielding new insights into the scientific impact of individual countries and the performance of journals that they published. 相似文献
19.
《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2023,49(4):102749
In recent times, there has been a proliferation of questionable practices in research publishing, for example, via predatory journals, hijacked journals, plagiarism, tortured phrases and paper mills. This paper intends to analyse whether journals that had been removed from the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) in 2018 due to suspected misconduct were cited within journals indexed in the Scopus database. Our analysis showed that Scopus contained over 15 thousand references to the removed journals identified. The majority of the publications citing these journals came from the area of Engineering. It is important to note that although we cannot assume that all the journals removed followed unethical practices, it is still essential that researchers are aware of the issues around citing journals that have been suspected of misconduct. We suggest that research libraries play a crucial role in training, advising and providing information to researchers about these ethical issues of publication malpractice and misconduct. 相似文献