共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 515 毫秒
1.
文章主要结合笔者从事参考咨询服务的实践经验,探讨了图书馆面向教师的参考咨询服务策略：一是建立与教师互动的参考咨询服务模式,二是努力提升教师的信息素养,三是加强参考咨询馆员的信息服务能力。 相似文献
2.
文章对一般意义的参考咨询服务和社科研究机构图书馆的参考咨询服务的功能进行了比较研究,认为后者的现实的参考咨询服务应在建立学科信息资源库的基础上为社会科学研究提供真实、科学、广泛并且带有创新性的信息支持,实现参考咨询服务从一般信息查询到课题跟踪服务的职能转变. 相似文献
3.
知识经济时代,图书馆咨询服务从传统的参考咨询服务向现代化的知识咨询服务转变.与参考咨询服务相比,知识咨询服务保证了信息提供的精准、及时,提高了知识服务水平,保证了服务质量.针对图书馆咨询服务展开讨论,分析了图书馆咨询服务如何从参考咨询向知识咨询转变,实现了服务能力的再创造. 相似文献
4.
导言:
参考咨询服务历来是图书情报机构的核心服务内容之一,在当今数字化、网络化时代,数字参考咨询服务是提升服务水平、提高文献信息资源利用率的一个关键因素.如何更好地开展数字参考咨询服务?本文作者从系统分析的角度出发,谈论了全方位数字参考咨询体系建设.…… 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
通过对福州大学城8所本科院校图书馆信息咨询服务的调研发现,各院校既有各自的特色与服务,也呈现出能力与水平的参差不齐。依托福州大学城合理配置与整合的学科特色资源,由学科服务团队利用联合参考咨询平台,这种基于学科的高校区域性联合参考咨询服务模式有助于提升整个区域的专业化信息服务水平以及知识服务能力。 相似文献
8.
高校图书馆信息服务模式的转变及新建本科院校图书馆的尝试 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
分析了网络环境下高校图书馆信息服务模式的新发展和新变化,并介绍了联机公共目录查询、网上数据库检索服务、电子化参考咨询服务的内容和特点,结合新建本科院校图书馆建立信息服务模式的经验指出了高校图书馆转变信息服务模式的途径。 相似文献
9.
10.
强化专题文献数据库建设 倡导参考咨询充分服务 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
在当今科技、文化的全新背景下，高校图书馆常规性的参考咨询服务已远不能满足读者的需求。本文依据微机查询系统所存在的问题，阐明了健全文献数据库的重要性，力求参考咨询充分服务，使信息资源效应实现最大化。 相似文献
11.
Although librarians’ increasingly important role as teachers is among the most significant shifts and trends that have been reshaping academic libraries over the past few decades, most academic librarians have not received formal training in pedagogy and teaching. The authors describe how becoming familiar with educational theory and research enabled them to revamp freshmen library workshops. They provide a theoretical overview and present practical classroom applications of learning styles theory, active learning techniques, learning by analogies, collaborative learning, and group work. Learning theories and educational research findings, the authors suggest, can be readily translated into practice and inform the teaching of information literacy to freshmen. 相似文献
12.
[目的/意义]通过分析高校图书馆员在创客空间环境下应起到的支撑和保障作用,明确图书馆员应具备的创新服务能力及要求,对图书馆员创新能力提升的有效路径提出相应的建议。[方法/过程]在分析图书馆员所需提供的保障服务基础上,归纳总结图书馆员基于创客需求的服务中所必需具备的服务能力。[结果/结论]创客时代,图书馆服务方式的转变要求图书馆员不断增强快速接受新事物、沟通协调、信息挖掘、数据管理和团队协作等服务能力,图书馆员只有不断更新知识、提升自身服务能力才能有效保障用户的跨学科协作学习需求。 相似文献
13.
《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(38):191-200
The relationship between reference librarians and technical services librarians has often been strained. In our changing technological and organizational environment, it is imperative that reference librarians and technical services librarians share responsibility for improving this relationship. One way for this to take place is for individuals to become more "accountable" to their colleagues. This article provides accountability guidelines for both reference and technical services librarians which, if followed, can result in increased communication and a better understanding of the roles, concerns, and needs of both reference and technical services librarians. 相似文献
14.
《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(30):59-70
In order to keep pace with a sophisticated clientele who expect instantaneous delivery systems, reference service specialists who have typically looked at document delivery as their ultimate job function now need to look at satisfaction of patron needs. For reference librarianship to be successful, it has to be seen as a valuable and convenient commodity to the user, who comes to rely on the librarian and to trust in the necessity of the service as well as its availability. Reference librarians, then, should look at broadening their services to reach individuals and specialized populations, not "the general public." They will revamp their present service programs to accomodate adult learners, small business owners, and communities with strong ethnic and cultural majorities. Continuing education activities have to be offered in tandem with this transformation of the service itself so that librarians build on traditional reference skills by incorporating business administration, marketing, and adult learning as part of the total educational picture. 相似文献
15.
《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(22):81-91
Twenty-four public and academic reference librarians were surveyed for the purpose of obtaining information about the services if any, that they currently provide for information brokers, the appropriateness of providing reference services for those who market the information obtained, and whether or not reference departments of public and academic libraries should provide competing fee based reference services. Few public or academic librarians objected to providing reference services for information brokers. Academic reference librarians expressed the view that service should not interfere with services for their primary clientele. Public reference librarians generally held the opinion that their services should be available to all and had already been provided for with public funds. Both public and academic reference librarians expressed concern about qualifications of some commercial suppliers of information as this effected their relationship with them. Public reference librarians were of the opinion that information brokers did not compete with the library and the library should be hesitant about providing fee based reference services. Academic reference librarians were divided in their opinoins about the latter. 相似文献
16.
国外嵌入式图书馆服务研究进展 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
在大量文献调阅与成功案例研究的基础上,对20世纪以来国外嵌入式图书馆服务的理论与实践进行梳理,认为嵌入式图书馆服务的概念逐步深入人心、理论与实践框架日益清晰、嵌入式馆员越来越受到人们青睐、嵌入式实践遍地开花、学术机构的嵌入式服务独占鳌头、不断探索嵌入式技术与应用等几大研究进展,希望能为我国的图书馆服务创新提供借鉴与启示。 相似文献
17.
万文娟 《图书馆工作与研究》2021,(1):109-115
学习障碍是影响MOOC学习者学习效能与学习持续性的主要因素。MOOC学习者主要面临MOOC选择障碍、MOOC学习自制力障碍、MOOC学习交流障碍、MOOC学习参考资源障碍、MOOC学习信息技能障碍。高校图书馆可利用自身优势,在课程选择、学习空间、学习资源、学习技能、学习反馈方面有针对性地开展MOOC学习支持服务,通过树立服务意识、健全管理制度、提升馆员素质、开展需求调研、寻求协同合作等策略帮助MOOC学习者突破障碍,提升学习支持服务质量。 相似文献
18.
时代理念·人文内涵·专业主义精神——论“学习型馆员”与“学习型图书馆” 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
论文提出学习型馆员必须重视阅读,追求创意,勇于进取,志存高远,而在人文内涵上,要有爱岗乐业的专业主义精神、博学杂览的知识底蕴、灵活周全的公共关系能力、用户至上的文献服务水平以及与时俱进的学科前沿意识。学习型图书馆应该成为学习型馆员的平台,论文进而提出了学习型图书馆建设的十个拓展型指标,指出专业主义精神乃是学习型图书馆的核心竞争力。 相似文献
19.
手机应用于大学图书馆信息素养教育的研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
手机图书馆、移动学习及智能手机的发展,推动了基于手机的大学图书馆信息素养教育的开展。应用手机开展的信息素养教育可通过移动优化信息素养教育网站、音频和视频指南下载、参考咨询服务、手机二维码应用、课堂反馈系统和微博等方式实现。手机的应用使大学图书馆信息素养教育方式多样化、目的性更强,使读者能够零散化学习,提高了用户与馆员的交互性。大学图书馆应顺应发展,重构信息素养教育资源,积极探索手机信息素养教育新方式。 相似文献
20.
《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(74):37-47
Summary It would be easy to say that technology is complicating things for reference, but things are more complicated than that. Technology should be a system for solving problems, but for many people, both librarians and users, it is the problem. But in some ways it hides an even older problem-understanding things from the user's point-of-view. Contemporary cognitive and educational theories note that we are not paying enough attention to the user/learner, that we do not understand the mental models of those who use libraries, library systems and reference. As more technology is used and complicates systems for users, we should focus more on what users bring to the reference/learning interaction. 相似文献