共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
2013年国际开放获取实践进展 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
通过跟踪2013年世界重要科研资助机构、科研机构、政府部门、出版机构的开放获取政策、研究报告和动态消息,从开放获取政策、开放出版实践、开放获取知识库的发展趋势以及新的开放获取学术信息交流模式（如开放数据和开放获取图书）等方面总结2013年国际开放获取实践方面的具体进展。 相似文献
3.
This article reports on scholarly communication and open access (OA) in Korea. Drawing on a range of databases, articles, and reference sources, it provides unique insights. In contrast to the UK/US model of scholarly communication, in Korea, most scholarly journals are published by discipline‐based scholarly societies and research institutes affiliated to universities. Payment for publication is the norm, and typically features article processing charges and scholarly society membership fees for both OA and toll access (TA) journals. Online access to journals in Korea is provided by commercial vendors who enter into contracts with the scholarly societies for exclusive use. Three online access models apply – TA, gold OA, and dual access – with the use of these models varying between disciplines. In parallel with this access provided by commercial vendors, there are a number of government‐funded open access repositories (OARs) to which university researchers are requested to deposit their research outputs, as well as OARs run by universities and other research institutes. 相似文献
4.
Pierre BARUCH 《Learned Publishing》2007,20(4):267-282
This article presents an overview of open access publishing and open access archiving in France. In natural sciences, most articles are published in international journals; authors must therefore comply with the policies of their publishers, irrespective of their nationality. For humanities and social sciences, where publication tends to be distributed among many small journals, portals have been created to provide electronic publishing, with varied access policies. Open archives repositories have been in existence in France since 2001; from 2006, a proactive policy led the main research agencies and universities to coordinate their actions towards a common archiving platform, HAL (Hyper Articles on Line), operated by CNRS (Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique), with individual portals, either thematic or institutional. HAL stores now the majority of open access records – presently some 10–15% of French output – and is growing almost exponentially. 相似文献
5.
MartaMestrovicDeyrup MarthaFallahayLoesch 《图书情报工作》2005,49(6):37-44
National and institutional policies on open access are not yet fully established in the United States because of the manner in which the open access movement has evolved. In this report, the authors illustrate how the open access movement has evolved within each community libraries, universities, publishing companies, government agencies, the professoriate, public interest groups, and the U.S. Congress and note what trends now are beginning to emerge. 相似文献
6.
[目的/意义]澳大利亚是开放获取（OA）运动的引领者和积极践行者,研究澳大利亚大学开放获取政策的现状和特点,对国内开放获取运动的顺利推进有积极借鉴意义。[方法/过程]搜集澳大利亚38所大学和2个官方资助机构的共计40份开放获取政策原文,以此为基础对原文进行统计分析和文本解读,从澳大利亚开放获取政策的发布时间、产生机制、实现途径、政策目的、实施范围、概念定义、存缴类型、开放要求、各方职责、版权声明这10个方面,较为全面地揭示澳大利亚大学开放获取政策的现状和特点。[结果/结论]澳大利亚大学开放获取政策有以下特点：澳大利亚的大部分大学都发布了开放获取政策,占比88.6%的高普及率归功于政府科研资助机构的政策示范和经费推动;各大学对开放获取政策持积极态度,自上而下推进政策发布与实施;各大学偏向于支持和鼓励绿色OA的发展之路,对科研成果的OA自存储规定偏强制性;对OA政策的相关概念给出了明确定义,内容完整规范清晰,可操作性强。以此为基础提出了推动我国开放获取运动的建议。 相似文献
7.
[目的/意义] 随着国际组织、国家和科研及基金资助机构对开放获取（OA）运动的支持力度进一步加强,开放获取政策不仅在数量上不断增加,其强制力度也在加深,促进了全球科研交流的发展。总结梳理强制性且带有激励措施的OA政策的实践进展,可为我国相关政策主体制定与改进相应的OA政策提供借鉴和参考。[方法/过程] 首先通过文献调研及网站调研强制性且带有激励措施的OA政策的制定现状,分别概括基金资助机构与科研机构的此类政策所包含的激励措施的特点;其次,以科研机构为例,利用机构WOS论文在机构指定的存储库中的存储情况来反映机构OA政策的执行效果,对比分析此类政策与未制定激励措施的强制性OA政策、鼓励性OA政策实施效果的差异。[结果/结论] 目前制定强制性且带有激励措施的OA政策的机构较少,基金资助机构主要采取削减项目资助资金或取消受资助者再次申请基金资格的惩罚性措施来督促科研人员遵守其OA政策,科研机构则将科研人员遵守OA政策的情况与其绩效评估相挂钩,借以激励机构成员实现研究产出的开放获取;实证分析发现强制性且带有激励措施的OA政策相比于另外两类OA政策执行力度更强、实施效果更好。 相似文献
8.
2014年国际开放获取实践进展 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
[目的/意义]开放获取的发展得到了各方的普遍关注,了解世界范围内主要参与者的发展动态,有助于图书馆把握开放获取的发展趋势和开放获取所带来的机遇,参与开放获取,应对挑战.[方法/过程]跟踪2014年世界重要政府机构、科研资助机构、科研机构、出版商、国际组织的开放获取政策、研究报告、项目计划和动态消息,在此基础上进行归纳总结.从开放存储、开放出版以及开放资源的组织和利用形式等方面总结2014年国际开放获取实践的具体进展和发展趋势.[结果/结论]2014年开放存储整合趋势增强、转向开放数据存储,开放出版从试验走向政策支持,开放资源的组织和利用不断深化、由目录揭示转向资源集成.在开放获取发展的历史浪潮中,图书馆是不可或缺的中坚力量. 相似文献
9.
Mary Anne KENNAN 《Learned Publishing》2007,20(2):138-146
This paper briefly describes the rapidly changing research evaluation and funding landscape in Australian universities, specifically in relation to open access and institutional repositories. Recent announcements indicate that funding and evaluation bodies are becoming increasingly concerned that publicly funded research be made publicly available. The paper then reports a survey of all levels of academic staff plus research students at one Australian university, conducted in May 2006, prior to the introduction of an institutional repository. The survey, in line with previously reported surveys, found that while there was a high level of engagement with scholarly publishing, there was a low level of awareness of, or concern with, either open access (‘green’ or ‘gold’) or the roles repositories can play in increasing accessibility of research. Practically, this indicates that much work needs to be done within this university to increase knowledge of, and change behaviours with regard to, open access and repositories if the university and its academics are to make the most of new funding requirements and research evaluation processes. 相似文献
10.
[目的/意义]为我国进一步推动落实已签署的OA2020倡议提供参考建议。[方法/过程]通过网络调查跟踪观测全球主要科技国家教育机构、研究机构、资助机构、图书馆和国际组织实施大规模学术期刊开放出版转换的行动，并梳理归纳国际主要出版商对转换所持的不同态度和行动，分析总结上述学术出版参与主体在转换中存在的问题和挑战，提出可能的应对策略。[结果/结论]通过分析，从承认国家差异性、转变图书馆角色、与出版商协商合作、解决开放出版目前问题、正视扣减和抵消制度不足5个方面提出进一步深化开放获取发展，实现OA2020倡议的可行性建议。 相似文献
11.
12.
我国科研人员对科技信息开放获取的态度————以中国科学院科研人员为例 总被引：14，自引：1，他引：13
文章以对中国科学院部分科研人员的访谈和问卷调查为基础,调查我国科研人员对科技信息开放获取的态度及意愿,并从开放获取资源、科研机构和科研人员自身特点等角度分析了科研人员参与科技信息开放获取的影响因素,建议政府、科研机构和科研资助机构要积极扶持开放获取期刊的发展,将开放获取期刊纳入科研评价体系之中,支持学术论文的自存储。 相似文献
13.
14.
[目的/意义] 日本开放获取运动的发展在亚洲遥遥领先,研究日本强制性开放获取政策对推动我国开放获取政策的制定和实施具有借鉴意义。[方法/过程] 通过查阅国内外开放获取政策相关文献和调研日本15个机构实施的强制性开放获取政策,从开放目的、开放获取对象、版权声明和责任归属4个方面分析政策内容,从政策制定参与主体多元化、大学占主体、专门委员会负责管理运营和政策评估、政策允许撤回学术成果以及政策侧重点不断调整等几个角度归纳政策实施特征。[结果/结论] 从构建自上而下的开放获取政策体系、政策以重点高校为侧重点、逐步推广、成立高校机构知识库管理委员会,以及强化图书馆员和科研人员开放获取意识等几个方面对我国开放获取政策的制定与实施提出建议。 相似文献
15.
16.
[目的/意义]通过对国外机构知识库存缴机制与政策的调查分析,希望为我国机构知识库在内容存缴机制和政策保障方面提供借鉴。[方法/过程]首先,从存缴内容、存缴方式及流程、组织保障3方面对国外机构知识库的存缴机制进行研究,其次,从资助机构和科研机构存缴政策两方面对国外机构知识库存缴政策进行详细的分析。[结果/结论]通过对国外机构知识库存缴机制与政策的分析,发现国外机构知识库存缴内容和来源多种多样,中介存缴、OAI-PMH开放获取收割方式是必然趋势;在存缴政策方面,资助机构和科研机构实施的强制性存缴政策对资源的存缴起着决定性作用,尤其是在国家不同层面制定政策来促进资源的存缴;在科研机构层面政策的制定上,辅助以激励政策,与科研管理系统相关联进行科研评价也是促进资源存缴与开放的一种新的政策模式。 相似文献
17.
Stephen PINFIELD 《Learned Publishing》2010,23(1):39-52
An increasing number of research funders are introducing open access (OA) policies. At the same time, publishers are introducing OA publication options. Research institutions need to consider how to respond to these developments, including the possible introduction of institutionally co‐ordinated funds for payment of OA publication charges. This paper describes the international background to the issue of institutional OA funds and summarizes the current UK situation, presenting recently gathered data from UK institutions. It then reports on work carried out by the University of Nottingham to introduce and manage an institutional OA fund. Early usage data of the Nottingham fund are presented. The paper outlines lessons learned from the Nottingham experience, then goes on to suggest a number of ways in which institutions and other agencies can take developments forward. 相似文献
18.
学术期刊开放式访问中的著作权问题及其对策 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
根据国内开放式访问的开展情况,指出了开放式访问中可能存在的著作权风险,并分析了开放式访问的法律性质,厘清了一些关于开放式访问法律风险的错误认识。给出了规避开放式访问中法律风险的对策,可供开展开放式访问的相关机构参考。 相似文献
19.
This paper reports on a study – overseen by representatives of the publishing, library, and research funder communities in the UK – investigating the drivers, costs, and benefits of potential ways to increase access to scholarly journals. It identifies five different but realistic scenarios for moving towards that end over the next five years, including gold and green open access, moves towards national licensing, publisher‐led delayed open access, and transactional models. It then compares and evaluates the benefits as well as the costs and risks for the UK. The scenarios, and the modelling on which they are based, amount to a benefit‐cost analysis to help in appraising policy options. Our conclusion is that policymakers should encourage the use of existing subject and institutional repositories, but avoid pushing for reductions in embargo periods, which might put at risk the sustainability of the underlying scholarly publishing system. They should also promote and facilitate a transition to gold open access, while seeking to ensure that the average level of publication fees does not exceed c.£2.000; that the rate in the UK of open access publication is broadly in step with the rest of the world; and that total payments to publishers from UK universities do not rise as a consequence. 相似文献